From: "Mikael P. Sundqvist" <mickep@gmail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: position of qed symbol in proofs
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 14:40:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHy-LL-qL139zkiNakoEbeFMnjXURG4A0k3RUNgiTJCaS1_MAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHy-LL-Ps-tq8qvmrd0A82_icDmZzTzPq3cpdc1fZZz0NuT+0w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist <mickep@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I once used
>
> \defineenumeration[proof][
> text=Proof,
> closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
> closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi,
> ]
>
> \starttext
> \startproof
> This is a simple proof.
> \stopproof
>
> \startproof
> This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
> \startformula
> 1+1=2.
> \stopformula
> \stopproof
> \stoptext
>
> to get the \square at the end of proofs, and it worked out well. But
> with the latest beta (and some previous one(s)), the \square is not
> placed at the same line as the formula in the second example. Is it
> broken? Or is there a new syntax?
>
> PDF with my result is attached.
>
> Best regards, Mikael
I don't like to bump, but... Noone else has this problem?
@Hans: Is it easily fixed?
/Mikael
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-08 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-03 20:15 Mikael P. Sundqvist
2014-11-08 13:40 ` Mikael P. Sundqvist [this message]
2014-11-08 16:43 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-09 20:29 ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
2014-11-10 5:54 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-10 9:08 ` Hans Hagen
2014-11-10 9:31 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-10 9:58 ` Hans Hagen
2014-11-10 10:22 ` Otared Kavian
2014-11-11 13:55 ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
2014-11-11 15:29 ` Hans Hagen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHy-LL-qL139zkiNakoEbeFMnjXURG4A0k3RUNgiTJCaS1_MAA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mickep@gmail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).