ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fwd: Re: The binomial coefficients do not look optimal
       [not found] <d4eb754b-9b68-2801-4bfe-378195d1af0d@wxs.nl>
@ 2017-09-02 16:36 ` Hans Hagen
  2017-09-05 18:21   ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2017-09-02 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] The binomial coefficients do not look optimal
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 18:35:53 +0200
From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
To: Mikael P. Sundqvist <mickep@gmail.com>

On 9/2/2017 4:58 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl 
> <mailto:pragma@wxs.nl>> wrote:
> 
>     On 9/1/2017 1:56 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
> 
>         Hi,
> 
>         I stumbled upon this (see the attached file for the result):
> 
>         %%% Test file
>         \setupbodyfont[10pt]
>         \starttext
>         \startTEXpage[offset=10pt]
>         \type{\tbinom{n}{k}}: $\tbinom{n}{k}$, (does not look good, the
>         vertical space between $n$ and $k$ is too big) \par
>         \type{\binom{n}{k}}: $\binom{n}{k}$ (looks fine to me)\par
>         \type{\dbinom{n}{k}}: $\dbinom{n}{k}$ (does not look good, too
>         big parenthesis, even for displayed formulas).\par
>         \stopTEXpage
>         \stoptext
>         %%% End of test file
> 
>         I think something should be changed to get the binomial
>         coefficients to look better. In particular I am concerned about
>         the rather big parenthesis in displaystyle (and not so much
>         about the vertical space issue in \tbinom).
> 
>         /Mikael
> 
>         PS The result looked better if I used the lucida fonts, if that
>         helps.
> 
>     This is indeed font dependent. These binoms use a low level tex
>     primitive that uses a threshold for steps and that one is part of
>     the math parameters of a font and these are not that good for lm. As
>     I'm looking into some other low level side effect I was in the mood
>     for a configuration option for \setupmathfractions.
> 
>     So, in the next beta you can get the effects iof the attached:
> 
>     - relate the threshold to the bodyfont size
>     - use normal left/right fences instead
> 
>     fwiw, cambria and pagella look better too. Upto you to wikify it.
> 
>     Hans
> 
>     -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>                    Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>             tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl
>     <http://www.pragma-ade.nl> | www.pragma-pod.nl
>     <http://www.pragma-pod.nl>
>     -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>     ___________________________________________________________________________________
>     If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
>     entry to the Wiki!
> 
>     maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> /
>     http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>     <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>
>     webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>     archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>     <https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/>
>     wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>     ___________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> Thank you very much, I'm looking forward to the next beta, and I will 
> try to wikify it when I have tried it out. Also lucida looks better than 
> latin modern does at the moment.
> 
> I am a bit confused about the different versions. I would have guessed 
> that there was \tbinom and \dbinom and that \binom used one of them 
> depending on if one is in text mode or in display mode (just as I would 
> expect \frac to behave like \tfrac in text mode and \dfrac in display 
> mode). But \tbinom looks very different from \binom in text mode (with 
> more vertical space).  Is this on purpose? Have I missed something?
One can configure those things but the absense of rules and presence of 
fences matters too (all kind of inter-this-or-that and 
above-below-this-or-that playts a role).

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: Re: The binomial coefficients do not look optimal
  2017-09-02 16:36 ` Fwd: Re: The binomial coefficients do not look optimal Hans Hagen
@ 2017-09-05 18:21   ` Mikael P. Sundqvist
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mikael P. Sundqvist @ 2017-09-05 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5235 bytes --]

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:

>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] The binomial coefficients do not look optimal
> Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 18:35:53 +0200
> From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
> To: Mikael P. Sundqvist <mickep@gmail.com>
>
> On 9/2/2017 4:58 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl <mailto:
>> pragma@wxs.nl>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 9/1/2017 1:56 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         I stumbled upon this (see the attached file for the result):
>>
>>         %%% Test file
>>         \setupbodyfont[10pt]
>>         \starttext
>>         \startTEXpage[offset=10pt]
>>         \type{\tbinom{n}{k}}: $\tbinom{n}{k}$, (does not look good, the
>>         vertical space between $n$ and $k$ is too big) \par
>>         \type{\binom{n}{k}}: $\binom{n}{k}$ (looks fine to me)\par
>>         \type{\dbinom{n}{k}}: $\dbinom{n}{k}$ (does not look good, too
>>         big parenthesis, even for displayed formulas).\par
>>         \stopTEXpage
>>         \stoptext
>>         %%% End of test file
>>
>>         I think something should be changed to get the binomial
>>         coefficients to look better. In particular I am concerned about
>>         the rather big parenthesis in displaystyle (and not so much
>>         about the vertical space issue in \tbinom).
>>
>>         /Mikael
>>
>>         PS The result looked better if I used the lucida fonts, if that
>>         helps.
>>
>>     This is indeed font dependent. These binoms use a low level tex
>>     primitive that uses a threshold for steps and that one is part of
>>     the math parameters of a font and these are not that good for lm. As
>>     I'm looking into some other low level side effect I was in the mood
>>     for a configuration option for \setupmathfractions.
>>
>>     So, in the next beta you can get the effects iof the attached:
>>
>>     - relate the threshold to the bodyfont size
>>     - use normal left/right fences instead
>>
>>     fwiw, cambria and pagella look better too. Upto you to wikify it.
>>
>>     Hans
>>
>>     -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>                                                Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>>                    Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>>             tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl
>>     <http://www.pragma-ade.nl> | www.pragma-pod.nl
>>     <http://www.pragma-pod.nl>
>>     -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     ____________________________________________________________
>> _______________________
>>     If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
>>     entry to the Wiki!
>>
>>     maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl> /
>>     http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
>>     <http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context>
>>     webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
>>     archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
>>     <https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/>
>>     wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>>     ____________________________________________________________
>> _______________________
>>
>>
>> Thank you very much, I'm looking forward to the next beta, and I will try
>> to wikify it when I have tried it out. Also lucida looks better than latin
>> modern does at the moment.
>>
>> I am a bit confused about the different versions. I would have guessed
>> that there was \tbinom and \dbinom and that \binom used one of them
>> depending on if one is in text mode or in display mode (just as I would
>> expect \frac to behave like \tfrac in text mode and \dfrac in display
>> mode). But \tbinom looks very different from \binom in text mode (with more
>> vertical space).  Is this on purpose? Have I missed something?
>>
> One can configure those things but the absense of rules and presence of
> fences matters too (all kind of inter-this-or-that and
> above-below-this-or-that playts a role).
>
> Hans
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
>               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
>        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list
> info/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________________



Today the new beta appeared, so I added something on the wiki,

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Math/fractions

(I am not sure how to use the threshold key, so I made no examples with
that.)

Thanks, Hans, for the very quick new feature!

/Mikael

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 8542 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 492 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-05 18:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <d4eb754b-9b68-2801-4bfe-378195d1af0d@wxs.nl>
2017-09-02 16:36 ` Fwd: Re: The binomial coefficients do not look optimal Hans Hagen
2017-09-05 18:21   ` Mikael P. Sundqvist

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).