On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > I confirm that the latest beta (ConTeXt version 2016.08.11 13:56 MKIV beta) has the issue you are reporting. > This bug is absent from the current version from TeXLive2016, that is ConTeXt version 2016.05.17 19:20 MKIV current. > > Some time ago I reported an analogous issue with startalign, and it seemed to me that Hans fixed it. But it appeared again with the beta 2016.08.11 13:56. > > Best regards: OK > >> On 17 Aug 2016, at 14:20, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The test file >> >> \starttext >> \placeformula >> \startformula >> \startalign >> \NC \exp(t_1)\exp(t_2)\NC =x_1x_2=\exp(\ln(x_1x_2))\NR >> \NC \NC =\exp(\ln x_1+\ln x_2)=\exp(t_1+t_2).\NR[eq:explag1] >> \stopalign >> \stopformula >> >> \placeformula >> \startformula >> 1+1=2 >> \stopformula >> \stoptext >> >> gives the attached pdf. In the first formula, the location of the >> equation number seems to be wrong (I would have expected it to be to >> the right, like in the second example). In the (nice, but rather old >> now) My Way by Aditya, this does not seem to happen. >> >> /Mikael >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ >> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! >> >> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net >> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ >> wiki : http://contextgarden.net >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ With the latest beta, it looks better, but not perfect (I'd expect the (1) and the (2) to be aligned). Same input file as in the first email in this thread gives the attached pdf. /Mikael