Since ConTeXT is closer to plain TeX than LaTeX, it is more legitimate to
got the "dot tex" than latex :)

Le mar. 4 févr. 2020 à 17:57, Pablo Rodriguez <oinos@gmx.es> a écrit :

> On 2/3/20 3:28 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > On 2/3/2020 3:07 PM, Philipp A. wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Most text editors have LaTeX specific syntax highlighting, so it makes
> >> sense to give your ConTeXt file a ending it can be distinguished with.
> >> Is there a blessed one?
> >>
> >>   * .ctx: Would mirror the semi-common .ltx, but is used for XML files
> >>     inside of ConTeXt itself
> >
> > context ctx files are xml files indeed
> >
> >>   * .mkiv: Is that just for ConTeXt or all LuaTeX stuff? Would it make
> >>     sense to give text documents that extension?
> >
> > you can do that (or mkvi or lmtx or ...)
>
> Since there are already *.mkxl files in the ConTeXt distribution, I
> think it may make sense to name the LMTX version MkXL.
>
> In any case, MkXL is simpler and clearer that MkIV with LMTX.
>
> Pablo
> --
> http://www.ousia.tk
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>