I would suggest to advertise with the ending another trademark that is not
a zero-entropy word in the programming world when not randomly capitalized,
and, if possible, that is not an everyday English word either.

Mkiv is a good choice for the moment. If there would be no Mkvi and so on,
it is good forever.

Le lun. 3 févr. 2020 à 23:05, Wolfgang Schuster <
wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hans Hagen schrieb am 03.02.2020 um 15:28:
> > On 2/3/2020 3:07 PM, Philipp A. wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Most text editors have LaTeX specific syntax highlighting, so it
> >> makes sense to give your ConTeXt file a ending it can be
> >> distinguished with.
> >> Is there a blessed one?
> >>
> >>   * .ctx: Would mirror the semi-common .ltx, but is used for XML files
> >>     inside of ConTeXt itself
> >
> > context ctx files are xml files indeed
> >
> >>   * .mkiv: Is that just for ConTeXt or all LuaTeX stuff? Would it make
> >>     sense to give text documents that extension?
> >
> > you can do that (or mkvi or lmtx or ...)
> >
> >>   * Something else? (.tex doesn’t count, it’s shared with LaTeX files
> >>     and plain TeX files)
> > so then use mkiv
>
> Why not just <FILE>.context
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
>