ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Reller <christoph.reller@gmail.com>
To: ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: ZapfDingbats Unicode differences MKIV vs LMTX
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO8LnPGpsGa4Q7jYFM3LB-OWzhjsrGRv07AD22q7v99qdJ2KSQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1290 bytes --]

Dear List,

I have the following MWE:

\definefontsynonym[ZapfDingbats][file:ZapfDingbats][features=dingbats]
\usemodule [fnt-10]
\starttext
(1) \getglyphdirect{ZapfDingbats}{61491}\crlf % MKIV log: char  (U+0F033)
in font 'ZapfDingbats-4' with id 8: missing
(2) \getglyphdirect{ZapfDingbats}{983059}     % LMTX log: char 󰀓 (U+F0013)
in font 'ZapfDingbats-4' with id 8: missing
\ShowCompleteFont{name:ZapfDingbats}{14pt}{1}
\stoptext

In MKIV, line (1) fails to output the requested glyph, while line (2)
produces a "check" (✓). In LMTX, line (2) fails and line (1) produces the
"check" (✓) . The output of "\ShowCompleteFont" reports differing Unicodes
for the same glyphs. Apparently the Unicodes for ZapfDingbats have changed.

I would like to have a "check" (✓) in the output for both MKIV and LMTX.
Options:
A) Is there a way to address the glyph in ZapfDingbats for both MKIV and
LMTX uniformly, e.g. by glyph index? (By glyph name does not seem to work:
MKIV reports glyph names, LMTX does not.)
B) Is there a conditional that I can build into the source to distinguish
between MKIV and LMTX?
C) Is there a font in the distribution for which I can have a
"check"-symbol in both MKIV and LMTX?

Any help is appreciated!
Cheers,

Christoph

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1566 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 493 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18  9:23 Christoph Reller [this message]
2020-09-18 14:17 ` Hans Hagen
2020-09-19  4:18   ` Christoph Reller
2020-09-19 10:04     ` Hans Hagen
2020-09-21 12:55       ` Christoph Reller
2020-09-21 13:27         ` Hans Hagen
2020-09-22  5:19           ` Christoph Reller
2020-09-22 11:51             ` Hans Hagen
2020-09-22 11:57               ` Taco Hoekwater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAO8LnPGpsGa4Q7jYFM3LB-OWzhjsrGRv07AD22q7v99qdJ2KSQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=christoph.reller@gmail.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).