From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/108737 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christoph Reller Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: ZapfDingbats Unicode differences MKIV vs LMTX Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:40 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8054526568911383096==" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31799"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: ntg-context Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Sep 18 11:28:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJCgT-0008Ak-Eb for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:28:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6728B1A8F3B; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sOdN5nK953YI; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:58 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF021A8F4E; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:58 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3979B1A8F3E for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uCBhG-phMYuB for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.167.42; helo=mail-lf1-f42.google.com; envelope-from=christoph.reller@gmail.com; receiver= Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ACDC1A8F3B for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id x69so5382284lff.3 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 02:23:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BD1euFla49QcpGpR564WlRCTjyhuci3q7HXMyfKme7E=; b=SdTBcP393ySsm3ZQXmVsWQP/VnLV3aX+TkYztg4ZC9045b0D1W4dB52YNItyfcBveY pNVgTyQo5kguQcBM/C10eNgPkLmIkoTEn144lnt1yx7bcTE+wqFMhlhICwkMhlPIP7Ba 0W0bCA4MIRlkofEHQFEZVy7l2fFHVnEm9BJZXUAddgavP5xb56l1oJH5F1wzE3B/9yGD IKXGVXlTgoP73fF6OMEiTD5OOsfs0PhROGFPJnLKUkgLlG9feth00eaBdXWx5bhbSxQZ C/mmB2eYGQKZPKc1w1ZN3OSK2354cLb4qMpapQ746U/nDtsqll1Y40RWivqay87d+FCY blDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BD1euFla49QcpGpR564WlRCTjyhuci3q7HXMyfKme7E=; b=oNsBZ/SyCYAc3+f+a1kIeSDEA95XKHCNX3RvIp4TCj/QENyaV4O5cGBVcztKn61pvv ETrxcynxjexQzA7Anb08hoD30Qqb1vbLlQd60oSYfATHQb1nKaWvc5Fi7kzLkrvmBlvG rNmzpAPVTHQSC9S0nH9YTmWDHq5bRoDCkfzkFGBTKBfxbfg6G+GTJdNR17D3VrPX/g/w 0e4BvxOrxkOi9uNE9E6ykvEj5w/iWhas2r/QvbDOtBAX18uN69+aYxO1aehgsgrojKnX 1n51ZizB2Dw62dPiLnvwnTPH+jDPP7jYGa7CHZ7ruhN8sEdHrNeuSf5toyzDKM+x2g2g b8LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530xtQKTZlUJYRGgcqUcs/9rFZCSnPvMPxlowZiwgtqgj7rBpYRW ZNIOog4dP3ZH5eAiEdESn0JYVHuLcc2HTiTc6ompLIRfh2U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoxi+7vKxbGDY7jO3uey5B6cmy8tEkDkj1CWQbbSWGqNqj5ZmkurJZ65T6+qVPqD9zYuJvwcYGRC+1KELoR34= X-Received: by 2002:a19:488a:: with SMTP id v132mr9567156lfa.461.1600421036414; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 02:23:56 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.tex.context:108737 Archived-At: --===============8054526568911383096== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005dd9f805af930f36" --0000000000005dd9f805af930f36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear List, I have the following MWE: \definefontsynonym[ZapfDingbats][file:ZapfDingbats][features=3Ddingbats] \usemodule [fnt-10] \starttext (1) \getglyphdirect{ZapfDingbats}{61491}\crlf % MKIV log: char =EF=80=B3 (U= +0F033) in font 'ZapfDingbats-4' with id 8: missing (2) \getglyphdirect{ZapfDingbats}{983059} % LMTX log: char =F3=B0=80=93= (U+F0013) in font 'ZapfDingbats-4' with id 8: missing \ShowCompleteFont{name:ZapfDingbats}{14pt}{1} \stoptext In MKIV, line (1) fails to output the requested glyph, while line (2) produces a "check" (=E2=9C=93). In LMTX, line (2) fails and line (1) produc= es the "check" (=E2=9C=93) . The output of "\ShowCompleteFont" reports differing U= nicodes for the same glyphs. Apparently the Unicodes for ZapfDingbats have changed. I would like to have a "check" (=E2=9C=93) in the output for both MKIV and = LMTX. Options: A) Is there a way to address the glyph in ZapfDingbats for both MKIV and LMTX uniformly, e.g. by glyph index? (By glyph name does not seem to work: MKIV reports glyph names, LMTX does not.) B) Is there a conditional that I can build into the source to distinguish between MKIV and LMTX? C) Is there a font in the distribution for which I can have a "check"-symbol in both MKIV and LMTX? Any help is appreciated! Cheers, Christoph --0000000000005dd9f805af930f36 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear List,

I have the follow= ing MWE:

\definefontsynonym[ZapfDingbats][file:ZapfDing= bats][features=3Ddingbats]
\usemodule [fnt-10]
\starttext
(1) \get= glyphdirect{ZapfDingbats}{61491}\crlf % MKIV log: char =EF=80=B3 (U+0F033) = in font 'ZapfDingbats-4' with id 8: missing
(2) \getglyphdirect{= ZapfDingbats}{983059} =C2=A0 =C2=A0 % LMTX log: char =F3=B0=80=93 (U+F0013)= in font 'ZapfDingbats-4' with id 8: missing
\ShowCompleteFont{n= ame:ZapfDingbats}{14pt}{1}
\stoptext

In MKIV, lin= e (1) fails to output the requested glyph,=C2=A0while line (2) produces a= =20 "check" (=E2=9C=93). In LMTX, line (2) fails and line (1) produce= s the=20 "check" (=E2=9C=93) . The output of "\ShowCompleteFont" reports differing Unicodes fo= r the same glyphs. Apparently the Unicodes for ZapfDingbats have changed.

I would like to have a "check" (=E2=9C=93= ) in the output for both MKIV and LMTX. Options:
A) Is there a wa= y to address the glyph in ZapfDingbats for both MKIV and LMTX uniformly, e.= g. by glyph index? (By glyph name does not seem to work: MKIV reports glyph= names, LMTX does not.)
B) Is there a conditional that I can buil= d into the source to distinguish between MKIV and LMTX?
C) Is the= re a font in the distribution for which I can have a "check"-symb= ol in both MKIV and LMTX?

Any help is=C2=A0appreci= ated!
Cheers,

Christoph
--0000000000005dd9f805af930f36-- --===============8054526568911383096== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly9jb250ZXh0LmFhbmhldC5uZXQKYXJjaGl2ZSAgOiBodHRwczovL2JpdGJ1Y2tldC5v cmcvcGhnL2NvbnRleHQtbWlycm9yL2NvbW1pdHMvCndpa2kgICAgIDogaHR0cDovL2NvbnRleHRn YXJkZW4ubmV0Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCg== --===============8054526568911383096==--