From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/76711 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: A problem with arranging pages Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1338927673.12420.7.camel@marcin-laptop> <20120605224329.64a34eca@Zewz> <20120605225524.282ede95@Zewz> <20120605231904.42d1b23e@Zewz> <997D5914-E10D-4F6F-9D33-7AED31770264@googlemail.com> <20120605233630.4825cdda@Zewz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338932677 10217 80.91.229.3 (5 Jun 2012 21:44:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 21:44:37 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Jun 05 23:44:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sc1YJ-0001wp-EM for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:44:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2CD101DD; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PYsx9Bj6ZhJf; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABD9101DF; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EC2101DF for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id bOU7rL5zjyIi for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter3-ams.mf.surf.net (filter3-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.71]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321E101DD for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by filter3-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q55LiUWd028475 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 23:44:30 +0200 Original-Received: by wefh52 with SMTP id h52so5228934wef.14 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:44:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=ufyL4f32aoiEfxv29vLrgvUxAPtp+fMxMPklESozcIY=; b=azwVam3FYN4cvjIaTX6RN36PwV6cuBYRhuBAsPQkNqhlXSDjdeMtkbiAE8Rqbstr7K 0D/FNkG+0MQHwHabXhxdxXQszytGRjxg9DrvBwV3gjgsCbULgpgikA3vb8Tz7nTLEqDn bcHnLsuSm3VuUyGGqbLqptMiLd6Pg6KMN4oSENiN7/7ep0FajKWP/hg55irTO3QxVgJH bFIocENRoZGRiXyE3i6l5ABZ7CERF5iM9K+kRJjhLKTngZzbWbFE+Rop3q/jF8OyzlrL K2aotEjna9d4KOdVHRB5GOE77Vt4rAuiqzwHot44pyiWwz6aPaZJyAe3xRsjKwH1oo/x 3VDA== Original-Received: by 10.216.135.204 with SMTP id u54mr14277826wei.40.1338932670149; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:44:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.36] (p54BAF98E.dip.t-dialin.net. [84.186.249.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gv4sm363904wib.8.2012.06.05.14.44.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:44:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120605233630.4825cdda@Zewz> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=74.125.82.169; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 03HiJIunx - dfb72ef888ba - 20120605 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.71 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:76711 Archived-At: Am 05.06.2012 um 23:36 schrieb Marco: > On 2012-06-05 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> There is no need for layers because you can use \framed in a overlay > > Sure I can do that. But what's the advantage of using an overlay? In this case performance. > I find layers to be more flexible. 1. When you define a layer a overlay with the same name is created because multiple layers are combined in an overlay. 2. You can combine a layer and an overlay to avoid the setups method (search for \tightlayer). Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________