From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/54713 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: EnglishRule and Lua / Simplefonts module Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:16:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: <0DD98DB5-4DAF-4ED1-9C12-418BE6B5C27A@upcmail.ie> <94E0C076-4D33-464F-A0B8-F74B27019166@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259086645 6093 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2009 18:17:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:17:25 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Nov 24 19:17:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCzwx-0005Pk-IK for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:17:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3B9C9BA6; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NiK6nvYWZf8M; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04519C9B66; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E3FC9B66 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rWgxrLSQ5h2D for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:14 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f220.google.com (mail-bw0-f220.google.com [209.85.218.220]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AD8C9B41 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:14 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so5176083bwz.34 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:16:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=D6q/UJ0COMIv4nRsfdVOSPSp7QiZRcF4nFEEaU+jIlU=; b=n0wRCANEQ+ThSJJocy8PCXcuJydwmjmX0bjFJPcTOjke7qyfY1Fa0ytw1NqaE6+LEX sxJZJlYySC0kSfsrs9eMQk7Cv+77Eak6TtGvHdNX7CbuyiA98n/cL3YUXRCyGLq8hzIg iaW6RHXfSZgBRBS8BMRExNAerfnkU5HiHvJuM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=cyruJl07lvDS4Cz6COAJPyntniRj95GDM0yTJjW5h+zs+VMiJmkUHYyiDid2Lf68Fx j8730ZIg8eJ/5JtgZwfPPT41i7Uj71a6YJwe6T9O+YM8wZA6OmqLOszXyF8BLkGdFlQ5 XHHrz4nRNAp7do07sFo2N1rycjtTyPY3rJLNc= Original-Received: by 10.204.2.196 with SMTP id 4mr2930017bkk.7.1259086618428; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:16:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?192.168.2.23? (p5B2931E2.dip.t-dialin.net [91.41.49.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1488523bwz.1.2009.11.24.10.16.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:16:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <94E0C076-4D33-464F-A0B8-F74B27019166@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:54713 Archived-At: Am 24.11.2009 um 19:06 schrieb Otared Kavian: > Hi Charles and Wolfgang, > = > I have noticed the same problem, as the one Charles is describing, with t= he =AB English rule =BB or the =AB swelled rule =BB and mkiv, and I think t= hat this has nothing to do with fonts. Maybe, it is rather with the way \lo= calhsize is defined in recent versions of mkiv: the =AB rule =BB appears in= a rather starnge way on different pages. > = > My minimal example test file: And what should I see here, I get the same rule on each page. Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________