Re: suggestions for context documentation

[Victor Eijkhout <victor@eijkhout.net>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]

> \startitem Even an old manual can quite well describe
> functionality as much didn't change. It's only with \MKIV\ that
> some compatibility is dropped and only for obscure features. Of
> course I could trick users by regenerating a manual with a newer
> date. I often use the excellent book \quote {\TEX\ by Topic} which
> is already quite old and does not cover \ETEX, \PDFTEX, \LUATEX\
> or whatever but what is told in it is still true. I never look at
> it thinking it being old. \stopitem

Hans,

thanks for the compliments.

Let me point out that the source of TeX by Topic is available under  
the Gnu Public Documentation License, so anyone should feel free to  
add modern TeX additions to it. Personally I feel that the eTeX &  
pdTeX additions are mature enough that they could be added, of course  
with suitable markers to indicate their non-standardness. I don't have  
the time for this, but I'd welcome a collaboration with anyone that  
wants to invest the time.

Victor.


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1305 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________