From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31468 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Fundamental change in index mechanism ? Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:31:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <575B3C7E-6D80-4166-B0FE-4B384FF071E6@st.estfiles.de> <453B56EB.7070201@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161538358 19021 80.91.229.2 (22 Oct 2006 17:32:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Oct 22 19:32:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbhBR-0001s6-3Y for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3781FF52; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08009-03; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31581FF3F; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F711FF47 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08010-02 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.15]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id C2A831FF3C for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 29278 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2006 17:32:12 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [89.50.68.86]) (698580@[89.50.68.86]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Oct 2006 17:32:12 -0000 In-Reply-To: <453B56EB.7070201@elvenkind.com> Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31468 Archived-At: Am 22.10.2006 um 13:32 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: > Steffen Wolfrum wrote: >> Hi, >> >> because of a second edition I had to typeset a project from august >> 2006 a second time (with very, very little text changes). >> >> Then, I experienced that the register had changed (a simple \index >> [keyword] and \placeregister[index]). >> And with a closer look I saw that in the first edition the index >> entries also get listed in the index register when appearing also in >> the TOC content! Now, it was impossible for me to reproduce this: The >> first listed entries now came from the beginning of the actual text. >> >> Is this a know bug? (Is there already a fix for it?) > > IMO, the current behaviour (as I understand it) is a bugfix for the > known bug of pointlessly indexing a lookup table. > > Ask yourself: why would anyone want to be pointed to the table of > contents from within the register? > > Taco Sure, you are absolutely right (it was not my decision to typeset the = first edition the way it actually was set). As far as I could see =96 apart from temporary workarounds (I remember = troubles with columns) =96 all old ConTeXt files generate the same = output when typeset with a current ConTeXt version. So I was just wondering that my 3 month old file generates a = different output today. Steffen