From: Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Color Lost when Using 'texexec' vs 'context'
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:09:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6D17B6F-A3F5-4B0A-B6E4-F4C5098BF356@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C930BB92-BE29-493D-B9F2-7526B2B60D60@stien.de>
> The reason I switched to "texexec" was this (from the "Context Manual": "During the processing of itemizations the number of items is counted. This is the case with all versions. The next pass this information is used to determine the optimal location to start a new page. So do not despair when at the first parse your itemizations do not look the way you expected. When using TEXexec this is all taken care of."
>
> Is this still a problem with "context" or is this problem somehow solved with MkIV anyway?
ConTeXt needs two passes for itemize when you use the “fit” option to determine the width for the numbers or when you use reversed or random numbers but this works in MkII and MkIV. Page breaks before/between items can be controlled by a few keywords (intro, loose etc.) but ConTeXt doesn’t use twopass information for this.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-18 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.60.1331975009.3819.ntg-context@ntg.nl>
2012-03-18 3:26 ` Line Wrapping/Hyphenation in Chapter/Section Headings Malte Stien
2012-03-18 3:36 ` Color Lost when Using 'texexec' vs 'context' Malte Stien
2012-03-18 8:09 ` Wolfgang Schuster [this message]
2012-03-17 8:55 Malte Stien
2012-03-17 9:00 ` Mojca Miklavec
2012-03-17 9:03 ` Wolfgang Schuster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D6D17B6F-A3F5-4B0A-B6E4-F4C5098BF356@googlemail.com \
--to=schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).