From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/46473 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Kew Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: different behavior between xetex and luatex Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:08:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <68bfdc900812222026n4903d467qa3d6165d83d0eaa9@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230019832 24089 80.91.229.12 (23 Dec 2008 08:10:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 08:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jin-Hwan Cho , Hans Hagen , Taco Hoekwater , mailing list for ConTeXt users To: Yue Wang Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Dec 23 09:11:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LF2Mb-0001Ij-Pg for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:11:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6F21FD04; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:10:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23733-01-13; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:09:34 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7351FCB1; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:09:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B22C1FCB1 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:09:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23693-03-4 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:08:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp1.wsfo.org (smtp1.wsfo.org [208.145.81.51]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A061FB5B for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:08:53 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.link77.net (mail.link77.net [172.22.0.125]) by smtp1.wsfo.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBN88jFa022982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:08:46 -0500 X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.8.2 (ClamAV engine v0.94.1) Original-Received: from [84.69.183.229] (account jonathan_kew@sil.org HELO [192.168.1.126]) by mail.link77.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTPSA id 204276842; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:08:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <68bfdc900812222026n4903d467qa3d6165d83d0eaa9@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 172.22.0.51 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:46473 Archived-At: On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote: > Hi, all. > > I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I > think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish. > in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex > handle that quite well. however, in xetex, fi are treated as > ligatures. > I attach the files and output here. I don't know it is a bug in xetex, > context or dvipdfmx:( > > Yue Wang > I don't know how the ConTeXt+XeTeX font setup works, but I notice "language=trk" in your file. OpenType language tags are all-uppercase, so I would have expected this to be "language=TRK". If the proper language system isn't specified, you will get the default behavior, which includes the "fi" ligatures. In the LuaTeX case, I don't think *any* ligatures are enabled by default, so the language is irrelevant; notice that there's no "ff" ligature in your output either, even though this should be expected. JK ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________