ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas A. Schmitz" <thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de>
Subject: Re: Problem with German quotes and kerning
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:44:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D8DAB108-4E73-4118-85A6-FE4290C6D0CE@uni-bonn.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6faad9f00601250445r10e89c52x4401f0017dfffde2@mail.gmail.com>

Mojca,

thanks a lot for you reply!

On Jan 25, 2006, at 1:45 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

> On the transferred page:
>      http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Wishes_for_Latin_Modern
> there are already kerning issues listed.
>
> If the problem on that page is not expressed clearly enough (and if
> the proposal is not OK), add your comments to that page.

Well, the problem is that this is not really relevant to my question.  
Of course it would be good to have proper kerning for German quotes  
implemented in the fonts, Latin Modern or any other font. But the way  
this is now handled in lang-ger.tex, this kerning is not applied in  
ConTeXt! So even if LM were perfect in this regard, we still wouldn't  
have properly kerned German quotes (am I making sense here, or is  
this not clear enough?).

>
> I agree that kerning "German" style of quotation marks was (and
> perhaps still is?) horrible, perhaps slightly better in LM than it was
> in CM. We use them as well (to be honest - 95% of LaTeX-people uses
> the wrong ones).
>
> I use \quotation because of these reasons:
> - I never know which is the proper command to get the desired
> quotation marks with combination of ", `, ', ...
> - I trust Hans that the macro is optimized in such a way that the
> hyphenation and everything else on the word boundary will be OK
> (although I'm not sure what happens to kerning)
> - I can simply redefine the quotation marks or the style of text to be
> used, for example it's easy to replace them by guillemet/guillemot
> alternative if necessary
>
> It might be a personal decision which ones one uses, but I would say
> that using "` vs. \quotation is approximately the same as using \"{a}
> vs ä. All of them work, but the second variant is somewhat cleaner.

OK, this makes sense, especially your third point. If you use ConTeXt  
exclusively, quotation{} and \quote{} may have advantages, but you  
can't copy/paste text into, say, a file to be processed with LaTeX.  
And I use emacs + auctex, so I don't have to remember what I need to  
type, it is done automatically. OTOH, I could also configure auctex  
to write \quotation{ when I type ". It this meant that I would get  
proper kerning, I'd go for it...

Thanks, and best

Thomas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-25 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-23 12:18 Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-23 12:49 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2006-01-23 13:07   ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-25 12:45 ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-01-25 17:38   ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2006-01-25 17:44   ` Thomas A. Schmitz [this message]
2006-01-27  0:53     ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-01-27  8:51       ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-27  9:43         ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-27 10:16           ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-27 10:59             ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-27 12:58             ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-27 15:06               ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-27 15:56                 ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-27 16:16                 ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-27 17:17                   ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-27 19:48                     ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-28 13:16                       ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-30 11:13                         ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-30 11:42                           ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-01-30 11:43                           ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-01-30 11:16                         ` Hans Hagen
2006-01-30 13:44                           ` Thomas A. Schmitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D8DAB108-4E73-4118-85A6-FE4290C6D0CE@uni-bonn.de \
    --to=thomas.schmitz@uni-bonn.de \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).