From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/23978 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans van der Meer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: bimath vs bfmath Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:58:28 +0100 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133528412 22142 80.91.229.2 (2 Dec 2005 13:00:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Fri Dec 02 14:00:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiAUj-00019w-9c for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:58:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF23128A1; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:58:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10068-07-10; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:58:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EC0127A6; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:58:23 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA68127A6 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:58:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10040-06-2 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:58:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp.science.uva.nl (smtp.science.uva.nl [146.50.4.84]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E016E1288A for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:05:20 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from 119-24.uva.surfnetthuis.nl [145.98.119.24] by smtp.science.uva.nl with ESMTP (sendmail 8.11.6p2/config 11.36). id jB1FxIv17996; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:59:18 +0100 X-Organisation: Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands X-URL: http://www.science.uva.nl/ Original-To: NTG ConTeXt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:23978 Archived-At: Why does $\bfmath a \rightarrow b$ % b-f-math behaves different from $\bimath a \rightarrow b$ % b-i-math In the first I get a bold arrow, not in the second one. In bfmath the symbol font switches to bold, but in bimath it does not. The variables do change correctly to bolditalic in both cases.. Is the symbolfont in the mathfamilies not switched in \bimath? For the font (Lucida) I have normal and bold symbol definitions installed: sy=MathSymbol mo 1, \definefontsynonym [MathSymbol] [LucidaNewMath-Symbol] sybf=MathSymbolBold mo 1, \definefontsynonym [MathSymbolBold] [LucidaNewMath-Symbol-Demi] I did set \setupformulas[method=bold] in the preamble and verified that \boldfacemathmethod has the value 1. Inspection of font-bfm.tex did not give me the solution. I must confess being lost here. As an aside another observation with bold math. After: \setupformulas[method=bold] \startformula[method=bold]\bfm .... the call to \bfm makes \quad's in the math disappear (using lucidabright font setup) And in the default font (no fontsetting) \bfm even gives an error ! \textfont 7 is undefined (character !). \stopdisplaymath ->\stopinnermath $$ \ifgridsnapping \egroup \afterdisplayspa... yours sincerely, dr. H. van der Meer