From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/56361 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Willi Egger Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: combiation trickery again now with attachement - sorry Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:41:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4B7AFC22.80000@gmx.net> <9B085AAA-CD65-40EC-BACE-27C8A25E5906@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266500543 30748 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2010 13:42:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:42:23 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Feb 18 14:42:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni6dy-0007DY-Oq for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1644C9CB5; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:13 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id IgVoeuSKgbSs; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A232C9C9A; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6056CC9C9A for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zEddw8+jA4L5 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mars.digitpaint.nl (mars.digitpaint.nl [83.98.197.63]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B23C9AFD for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:42:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mars.digitpaint.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF2D14B22F for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:40:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mars.digitpaint.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digitpaint.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3VzH48hyjPvt for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:40:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.198] (a83-161-249-79.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.161.249.79]) by mars.digitpaint.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 86DF814B220 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:40:28 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <9B085AAA-CD65-40EC-BACE-27C8A25E5906@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:56361 Archived-At: Hi, that is indeed trickery. Though I did not try it, possibly using a = layer where the pictures and the captions are arranged could also be = used. The advantage of a layer would be, that it contains all the = pics and one would be able to move it as a hole to the spot intended. Willi On Feb 18, 2010, at 1:22 PM, Bernhard Rosensteiner wrote: > Am 16.02.2010 um 21:12 schrieb Peter Rolf: > >> Am 16.02.2010 19:40, schrieb Bernhard Rosensteiner: >>> Hi, >>> >>> in the attachment is an example file which describes best what i = >>> want do. The method with \offset and \clip to place the figures = >>> where i want is really brutal force i think. Especially fiddling = >>> around with dimension to get the "right fit=93 is tedious. Is there = >>> a better solution to do such a start/stopcombination? >>> Floatplacing is also influenced by the offset command but i = >>> compensated this with *hang - nevertheless all in all i think no = >>> good solution. Please help. >>> >> Hi Bernhard, >> >> that was fun. :) > > yeah - thanks. Really nice. This gives me the motivation to read = > The TeXbook. > > best regards > Bernhard > > ______________________________________________________________________ = > _____________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an = > entry to the Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ = > ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ______________________________________________________________________ = > _____________ ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________