From: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: placefigure feature request ?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:37:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1FRDoh-0003Oc-00@skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:06:30 +0200." <44340726.70503@wxs.nl>
From: Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
> \useMPlibrary[dum]
> \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
> \starttext
> \input tufte \placefigure[rightmargin]{first} {\externalfigure[dummy]} \par
> \input knuth \placefigure[top] {second}{\externalfigure[dummy]} \par
> \stoptext
>
> does commenting the no check line makes a differnece?
>
> nocheck: top=2, margin=1
> yes : top=1, margin=2 (default behaviour)
No difference. I get the default behavior in both cases, and both log
files mention the renumbering:
$ texexec 3.tex > somewhere
$ mv 3.log 3-nocheck.log
[comment out the nocheck line]
$ texexec 3.tex > somewhereelse
$ grep renumber 3{,-nocheck}.log
3.log:floatblocks : 1 renumbered / figure 1 => 2
3.log:floatblocks : 2 renumbered / figure 2 => 1
3-nocheck.log:floatblocks : 1 renumbered / figure 1 => 2
3-nocheck.log:floatblocks : 2 renumbered / figure 2 => 1
TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE
1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE
1992-2004
tex : pdfeTeX, 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
context : ver: 2005.01.31
cont-en : ver: 2005.01.31 fmt: 2006.3.28 mes: english
Maybe this context installation is too old for nocheck. On the other
hand, it should complain then?
-Sanjoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-05 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-04 15:44 Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-04 17:15 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-04 17:53 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-04 21:06 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-04 23:23 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-05 7:37 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-05 7:54 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-05 15:43 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-05 18:06 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-05 19:37 ` Sanjoy Mahajan [this message]
2006-04-05 20:46 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-06 2:20 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-06 8:01 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-04 21:23 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-05 15:48 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-05 16:53 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-12 22:12 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-13 7:57 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-13 13:30 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-14 8:52 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-14 13:59 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-14 14:09 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-14 16:45 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1FRDoh-0003Oc-00@skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk \
--to=sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).