ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: placefigure feature request ?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:37:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1FRDoh-0003Oc-00@skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:06:30 +0200." <44340726.70503@wxs.nl>

From:    Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl>
> \useMPlibrary[dum]
> \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck]
> \starttext
> \input tufte \placefigure[rightmargin]{first} {\externalfigure[dummy]} \par
> \input knuth \placefigure[top]        {second}{\externalfigure[dummy]} \par
> \stoptext
> 
> does commenting the no check line makes a differnece? 
> 
> nocheck: top=2, margin=1 
> yes    : top=1, margin=2  (default behaviour) 

No difference.  I get the default behavior in both cases, and both log
files mention the renumbering:

$ texexec 3.tex > somewhere
$ mv 3.log 3-nocheck.log
[comment out the nocheck line]
$ texexec 3.tex > somewhereelse
$ grep renumber 3{,-nocheck}.log
3.log:floatblocks     : 1 renumbered / figure 1 => 2
3.log:floatblocks     : 2 renumbered / figure 2 => 1
3-nocheck.log:floatblocks     : 1 renumbered / figure 1 => 2
3-nocheck.log:floatblocks     : 2 renumbered / figure 2 => 1

TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005

               texexec : TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE
               1997-2005
               texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE
               1992-2004
                   tex : pdfeTeX, 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
               context : ver: 2005.01.31
               cont-en : ver: 2005.01.31  fmt: 2006.3.28  mes: english

Maybe this context installation is too old for nocheck.  On the other
hand, it should complain then?

-Sanjoy

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-05 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-04 15:44 Renaud AUBIN
2006-04-04 17:15 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-04 17:53   ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-04 21:06     ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-04 23:23       ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-05  7:37         ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-05  7:54           ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-05 15:43             ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-05 18:06               ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-05 19:37                 ` Sanjoy Mahajan [this message]
2006-04-05 20:46                   ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-06  2:20                     ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-06  8:01                       ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-04 21:23     ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-05 15:48       ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-05 16:53         ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-12 22:12       ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-13  7:57         ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-13 13:30           ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-14  8:52             ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-14 13:59               ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-14 14:09                 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-14 16:45                   ` Sanjoy Mahajan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1FRDoh-0003Oc-00@skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).