From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26831 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sanjoy Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: placefigure feature request ? Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:37:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <44340726.70503@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144265861 10503 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 19:37:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Apr 05 21:37:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDou-0004Fp-Uo for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:37:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54ECE127A6; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:37:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29394-02; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BDE12791; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0F512791 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:37:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29601-01 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:37:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk (mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk [131.111.48.8]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 222201278F for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 21:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.48.158] ident=mail) by mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDoh-0004Qc-L5; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:37:23 +0100 Original-Received: from sanjoy by skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1FRDoh-0003Oc-00; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:37:23 +0100 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:06:30 +0200." <44340726.70503@wxs.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26831 Archived-At: From: Hans Hagen > \useMPlibrary[dum] > \setupfloats[numbering=nocheck] > \starttext > \input tufte \placefigure[rightmargin]{first} {\externalfigure[dummy]} \par > \input knuth \placefigure[top] {second}{\externalfigure[dummy]} \par > \stoptext > > does commenting the no check line makes a differnece? > > nocheck: top=2, margin=1 > yes : top=1, margin=2 (default behaviour) No difference. I get the default behavior in both cases, and both log files mention the renumbering: $ texexec 3.tex > somewhere $ mv 3.log 3-nocheck.log [comment out the nocheck line] $ texexec 3.tex > somewhereelse $ grep renumber 3{,-nocheck}.log 3.log:floatblocks : 1 renumbered / figure 1 => 2 3.log:floatblocks : 2 renumbered / figure 2 => 1 3-nocheck.log:floatblocks : 1 renumbered / figure 1 => 2 3-nocheck.log:floatblocks : 2 renumbered / figure 2 => 1 TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005 texexec : TeXExec 5.2.4 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005 texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2004 tex : pdfeTeX, 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) context : ver: 2005.01.31 cont-en : ver: 2005.01.31 fmt: 2006.3.28 mes: english Maybe this context installation is too old for nocheck. On the other hand, it should complain then? -Sanjoy