ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: version dates confuse me after upgrade
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 01:21:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1FRMve-0003yS-Ie@approximate.corpus.cam.ac.uk> (raw)

I just upgraded following the instructions on the wiki, and wanted to
check that it went well and that the newer ones were being found --
always a nightmare subject in *TeX* with paths configurable by a
combination of environment variables, config files, and config files
chosen by other env variables.  So:

$ texexec --version

 TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005

               texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
               texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2006
                   tex : pdfeTeX, 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4)
               context : ver: 2006.03.25 13:21
               cont-en : ver: 2005.01.31  fmt: 2006.3.28  mes: english

Here is the version line in the output of 'texexec somerandomfile.tex':

  ConTeXt  ver: 2006.03.25 13:21  fmt: 2006.4.6  int: english  mes: english

The context version date match what texexec --version produces (though
texexec doesn't give the fmt date).  But what does the early cont-en
version date (2005.01.31) mean?

-Sanjoy

`A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.'
   - Bertrand de Jouvenal

             reply	other threads:[~2006-04-06  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-06  5:21 Sanjoy Mahajan [this message]
2006-04-06  8:14 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-06 15:38   ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-06 15:58     ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-06 16:06       ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-06 21:17         ` Gerben Wierda
2006-04-06 22:10           ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-06 22:31           ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-06 18:31       ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-06 19:36         ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-04-06 21:07           ` Thomas A. Schmitz
2006-04-07 20:31           ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-08  8:56             ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-08 12:01               ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-04-08 12:40                 ` Hans Hagen
2006-04-06 20:40         ` Hans Hagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1FRMve-0003yS-Ie@approximate.corpus.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).