From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/29701 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sanjoy Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: [off-list, urgent] Index design Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:46:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <0333EC2E-E489-4453-9320-B8BD3B2A1E5A@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153925272 15296 80.91.229.2 (26 Jul 2006 14:47:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Jul 26 16:47:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5kes-00016f-Hb for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAB41FDD5; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30439-03-5; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83511FDD0; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD42E1FDD0 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:36 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30439-03-4 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk (mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk [131.111.48.8]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 2ACED1FDCD for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.48.158] ident=mail) by mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5kea-0006Ey-U5; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:46:28 +0100 Original-Received: from sanjoy by skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1G5kea-0002Of-00; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:46:28 +0100 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:15:33 +0200." <0333EC2E-E489-4453-9320-B8BD3B2A1E5A@st.estfiles.de> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:29701 Archived-At: > (Sorry for the strange conversation, but my e-mail appears with about > 20 minutes delay on the list. And Hans is faster.) I've noticed this too, after I found many examples where Hans or Taco would answer questions that I didn't even know people had! It seems that some emails (based on From: or destination address?) are delayed longer than others by the mailing list. Any ideas about what causes it? Would a few full headers showing what I mean help? -Sanjoy `Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.' --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.