From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30117 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sanjoy Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: \dontleavehmode and indenting after section (was Re: Context 2006.08.04 released) Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:34:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <44D8559B.8060208@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155040478 5530 80.91.229.2 (8 Aug 2006 12:34:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Aug 08 14:34:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAQmy-0008F1-AJ for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:34:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8861FDEF; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:34:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20153-04; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:34:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1381FDE6; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:34:21 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA491FDE6 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:34:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19865-02-4 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:34:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk (mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk [131.111.48.8]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id EA3D21FDDE for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:34:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.48.158] ident=mail) by mraos.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAQmk-00038p-JF; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:34:14 +0100 Original-Received: from sanjoy by skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1GAQmk-0001kB-00; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:34:14 +0100 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:12:59 +0200." <44D8559B.8060208@wxs.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30117 Archived-At: Hans wrote: > > Is that better than using \noindentation (suggested by the other > > Mahajan)? The one problem with it that I found is an extra space in > > indentation for the first paragraph. I guess it's because there's a > > space in horizontal mode somewhere that isn't being ignored (as it > > would have been in vertical mode)? > > > hm, try to nail that space down and let me know I couldn't find the extra space in the source, but here's the minimal test file in the hope that your eyes and understanding are sharper. The "I" from Indented? is indented a tiny bit relative to the section number (context 2006.08.02): \setuphead[section][after={\dontleavehmode}] \starttext \section{First} Indented? \stoptext