Re: XeConTeXt bug report I: strange benchmark

[Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>]

Am 13.05.2009 um 14:59 schrieb Hans Hagen:

> Yue Wang wrote:
>
>> compilation time, you can have a cup of tea and enjoy the sunshine...
>> Anyway, t-zhspacing is much faster than lualatex. but 1 minutes to
>> compile a 100 pages document is still too long)
>
> it all depends on what you use and want to achieve; also lualatex is  
> not
> relevant when we discuss for instance context mkiv which follows
> different routes
>
> (btw, mk.pdf takes some 55 seconds for a 300+ page document and that's
> 10 seconds for page faulting so on another machine it runs faster; and
> mk uses a lot of large fonts + some demanding typesetting like arabic)

1 min for 100 pages is very slow, I have a japanese/german book which
takes about 1 min for 600 pages, the slowest part is a very huge natural
table (over 700 cells) where ConTeXt needs about 1 second.

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________