From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/49562 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: [Contextcjk-commits] interlinespace problem testing result. Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:35:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <49E943EE.4020508@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240040222 14201 80.91.229.12 (18 Apr 2009 07:37:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users To: Wei-Wei Guo , ConTeXt CJK Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Apr 18 09:38:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lv580-00037t-Al for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:38:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92AB1FC09; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:51 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14756-02; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAA61FBD0; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0C41FBD0 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24039-05-5 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter2-til.mf.surf.net (filter2-til.mf.surf.net [194.171.167.218]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4085F1FBBE for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f176.google.com (mail-fx0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by filter2-til.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3I7aEKN028998 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:36:14 +0200 Original-Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so1283678fxm.2 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:36:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=AftuEGiTcRuGlJu7iGqAGFZhAi4ja9OQOIIKijwrd1s=; b=E7mq+43ysE29p+FsYHdX2RbIrm14AwRDC8FtgJfdiFlG8rrbdRQ9fLC2KKNbdaQIVp HkOAESx4jw3ZHToEMpyvyL+ekrz/88k5/YgNY4WS66VJLVM4Q7nop4zdYwZm8PAGyo1I NNzywuZ3uuX99UYRa3OUAhL7j5zGhYEwCRAQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=RVFIj8m839FXWW1edqau5ZwGJSOGeysjIUf27kYGu5adhahbDEdDFyDxAZ8ol0Rd/8 mF+hG43PTQPWuiDqiTfrHSO/+CsOYH6tZDlZbx7cIEIl4IcmeN53t/6eCTdbYFtZYFml /s/EVt7G3L8G88q14MI7yryzxRp8EH9gGVesU= Original-Received: by 10.86.1.1 with SMTP id 1mr2567151fga.0.1240040173842; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?10.40.131.226? ([82.113.121.152]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm1873268fgg.2.2009.04.18.00.36.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:36:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49E943EE.4020508@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.220.176; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 210486856 - 2da0613105dd - 20090418 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 194.171.167.218 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:49562 Archived-At: Am 18.04.2009 um 05:07 schrieb Wei-Wei Guo: > Dear all, > > Yanrui recommended the list to me. It's so good that having a > special place discussing > CJK issues. > > I have posted the problem interlinespace in > \setupbodyfontenvironment at ConTeXt user list. > Since I did some testing on Chinese fonts, I think those information > might be useful. I can't find a problem with Adobes fonts but your line distance of 2.3ex is to small, I think something between 3 and 4ex is sufficient. You can test it with a very big distance: \setupbodyfontenvironment[myfont][12pt] [interlinespace=6ex] Regards, Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________