From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/67813 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Difference between texexec and context when using indent Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303031332 20858 80.91.229.12 (17 Apr 2011 09:08:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:08:52 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Apr 17 11:08:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBNyJ-0007wW-7V for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D15CABE9; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 2cc20JwObejP; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9944CABDE; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864C0CABDE for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BK0tVvKSfxqj for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (filter2-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.70]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814BDCABDD for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com (mail-bw0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p3H98D7J022461 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:08:14 +0200 Original-Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so4900222bwz.14 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 02:08:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=mC3/8N1JBc9GpJKuUEUsp8A0ZS+/OqisExV2T1z7tKM=; b=lODC1wuPJNYaXIwDW+SOhwzNoWg1rmFyUgsF570cyYtPGoysi6/KybvciI1jgF8d9L /w+n4Aokv9LYjaDV3kKWY2hOgaQrNbtugFM4xjQH8QCtdviEMI1rD3IlxgGdbZ8qwZEt YQCPWGVsDV5TpZxkTt4b9lzRVQ/L+W0xkEaqo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=V+KhCEebH1KV9UZb3ukBaMUNhAbOM2Of7H3xrX3hscAidmbOEOhi0nhLGbmoECq1q2 eoFW7VKyfL4i5eFbIyRmIlKNHKOVJP/mIkgBxdpo9fZRMFBQveIL4RHCUoKNzuq7AC8G Lvc7hIpynZgZjSnp0Oos4+rliHHBkmZxdLetk= Original-Received: by 10.204.10.21 with SMTP id n21mr3164596bkn.77.1303031293580; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 02:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.31] (p5B29476A.dip.t-dialin.net [91.41.71.106]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm2494587bkm.18.2011.04.17.02.08.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Apr 2011 02:08:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=209.85.214.41; country=US; region=CA; city=Mountain View; postalcode=94043; latitude=37.4192; longitude=-122.0574; metrocode=807; areacode=650; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.4192,-122.0574&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0rEwx8dPm - 1819ded2f007 - 20110417 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.70 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:67813 Archived-At: Am 15.04.2011 um 14:11 schrieb Cecil Westerhof: > With the following code: > \setupindenting[yes,medium,next] > = > \starttext > = > \input knuth > = > \blank > = > \input knuth > = > \stoptext > = > When using texexec (MKII) the paragraph after the \blank is not > indented. When using context (MKIV) it is. Why this difference? And you think it=92s better to let \blank behave different dependent on the indenting settings? % engine=3Dpdftex \starttext \setupindenting[yes,medium,first] \input knuth \blank \input knuth \page \setupindenting[yes,medium,next] \input knuth \blank \input knuth \stoptext To control whether the next paragraph is indented or not should better be controlled with by \setupblank and not from \setupindenting. Wolfgang ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________