From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31476 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: German hyphenation broken ? Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161610172 8955 80.91.229.2 (23 Oct 2006 13:29:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Oct 23 15:29:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gbzrh-0007l5-Db for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:29:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD161FDFB; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24821-03; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:29:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DFE1FDD2; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:29:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF691FDEC for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:29:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24877-01-2 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.16]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 95DE31FC91 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 1787 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2006 13:25:22 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [89.50.66.38]) (698580@[89.50.66.38]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Oct 2006 13:25:22 -0000 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31476 Archived-At: Hi, could someone please have a look at the minimal example below: On my system it seems that the old germ hyphenation doesn't work = anymore. Line 7 and line 9 are for sure hyphenated according to the new rules = "Einbu-=DFen" and "Sy-stem" Do others experience the same or is only my installation broken? Steffen (pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.4-2.2, ConTeXt ver: 2006.10.13 20:06) \usetypescript[postscript][\defaultencoding] \setupencoding[default=3Dtexnansi] \mainlanguage[deo] \enableregime[mac] \newdimen\Vertikal \Vertikal=3D12pt \setupbodyfont[postscript,10pt] \setupinterlinespace[line=3D12pt] \definepapersize[Test][width=3D15.7cm,height=3D23.2cm] \setuppapersize[Test][A4] \setuplayout [width=3D113mm,height=3D48\Vertikal, backspace=3D20mm,topspace=3D15mm, header=3D\Vertikal,headerdistance=3D0.5\Vertikal, footer=3D3\Vertikal,footerdistance=3D0pt, location=3Dmiddle,marking=3Don,grid=3Dno] \starttext \quad \index{Rentenversicherung&=96 Zukunft der \~}Im Hinblick auf den = Umbau von Sozialversicherungssystemen hat das = Bundesverfassungsgericht allerdings einem k=FCnftigen Reformgesetzgeber = insoweit das Feld bereitet, als es angemerkt hat, da=DF das = westdeutsche (nunmehr gesamtdeutsche) gesetzliche = Rentenversicherungssystem von der M=F6glichkeit einer Umgestaltung = nicht so ausgenommen ist\footnote{Test}. Diese Tatsache ist nicht = neu; die bisher vorhandene Finanzkraft der Sozialversicherung hat die = Frage nur nicht aktuell werden lassen. Selbst wenn also ein = tiefgreifender Umbau verbunden mit Einbu=DFen in der Rechtssubstanz von = Anspr=FCchen stattfinden w=FCrde, k=F6nnte man sich nur schwer auf eine = Pr=E4zendenzwirkung des Urteils zur rentenrechtlichen = Systementscheidung je berufen\footnote{Test}; die Akzeptanz einer = entsprechenden Reform mag dadurch vielleicht steigen, da die = politischen Akteure argumentieren k=F6nnen, so etwas =E4hnliches habe es = schon einmal gegeben. \stoptext