From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/29725 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: setupitemize confusion Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2716E084-8B29-4B4B-99FE-195D2929BBA9@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153979664 8223 80.91.229.2 (27 Jul 2006 05:54:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Jul 27 07:54:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5ypB-00019Y-0w for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17221FDF4; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31966-03; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6841FDEE; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AB01FDEE for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31720-04 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id E3A931FDDD for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail 27041 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2006 05:54:07 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO [217.184.11.251]) (698580@[217.184.11.251]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Jul 2006 05:54:07 -0000 In-Reply-To: Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:29725 Archived-At: Am 27.07.2006 um 07:32 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> both paragraph should be indented 12 pt. But there are different: >> >> \starttext >> >> \startitemize[width=12pt] >> \sym{\endash}\input tufte >> \stopitemize >> >> \setupitemize[width=12pt] >> \sym{\endash}\input tufte >> >> \stoptext >> >> >> How do I make the second the same as the first? > > Shouldn't you wrap the second one with \startstop itemize? > > \setupitemize[width=12pt] > \startitemize > \sym{\endash}\input tufte > \stopitemize > > Aditya Well, I hope not! As far as I understood the manual (cont-eni) one can use \item and \sym also without the start-stop environment: in cases where it is just needed as one entry (not a list). This works, somehow. But is there no setup possible? I need it in a bibliography: the normal entries "author, title etc. maybe two lines" are hangindented with \hangafter=1\hangindent=12pt. But when a author has two or more titles it is written "- title etc. maybe two lines". And here the "- " must be the same space as the hangindent (12pt), as one can imagine easily. That's why I used a \item res. \sym for this. And a start/stop each would make the code quite chaotic. But maybe there is even another solution for this construction, even better? Steffen