From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/74639 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: footnotes rewritten Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <08CAF983-5CAB-4525-A0A4-4C727C904E82@st.estfiles.de> <2852DA0E-E487-4347-B6A3-2D2847DC70FA@st.estfiles.de> <4F44C6F0.30607@uni-bonn.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329909727 15599 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2012 11:22:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:22:07 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Feb 22 12:22:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S0AGr-0005vB-1a for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:22:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC9BCB234; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:22:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pSJRSt1y4lET; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:58 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335E0CB211; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:58 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25047CB211 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id EFKrR3D9plMv for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (filter2-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.70]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D51CAB03 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (smtprelay04.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.27]) by filter2-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id q1MBLo0f017578 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:51 +0100 Original-Received: from [89.247.113.68] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1S0AGc-0002x7-GF for ntg-context@ntg.nl; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 12:21:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F44C6F0.30607@uni-bonn.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Df-Sender: Njk4NTgw X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=80.67.31.27; country=DE; latitude=51.0000; longitude=9.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=51.0000,9.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 0rGAXlO0a - fdcdba35c0e5 - 20120222 (trained as not-spam) X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.70 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:74639 Archived-At: Am 22.02.2012 um 11:44 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: > On 02/21/2012 09:24 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: >> Am I the only one who uses footnotes ? >> >> ;o) >> >> Steffen >> > > No, I'm using footnotes too, and the current implementation is an absolute disaster. I get weird and unexpected behavior as well. > > 1. Footnotes are shifted to the following page. This puts a huge black triangle at the position of the footnote marker. I have no idea how to get rid of it, and I have no idea why this is the default behavior - nobody wants that in printed documents, I suppose? > > 2. Footnote numbers in the footnotes themselves are shifted one line down. > > Luckily, I still have 2011.11.29 around, which doesn't have these problems. Hans had warned about the current beta a few days ago; I hope things will calm down in the not-too-distant future... Unfortunately up to vers. 20120125 there is a bug when cite/index/startregister and bookmarks are used in a project. The first version that solved this bug was vers. 20120208 ... and this already introduced the new footnotes. The triangle can be switched of by "\setupnote[symbolcommand=\gobbleoneargument]", as Wolfgang knew. In general we'd need a comprehensive explanation what is new and what has to be changed. Steffen ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________