>> http://pdftohtml.sourceforge.net/
> Looks impressive...

I think so


> Looks VERY impressive... Tell me, how did you set up the cropmarks  
> etc.?

Mmh, maybe you're are referring to the original source? The output  
one is bare bone (what I need)
In any case, I upload the wrong reconstructed pdf (too late at night...)

The reconstructed pdf (pdf -->xml-->context-->pdf) is this one, where  
footnotes are handled correctly (an important point for me).
http://www.semiotiche.it/andrea/membrana/text.pdf
I rendered it with XeConTeXt. As noted by Mojca, there are some  
problems with double apices
In relation to footnote 1, this is what is coded in source :
"Sign and Reality"

> Did you also try pdftohtml --> html --> context?

No. You are suggesting via pandoc? Good point.
The exported html is very clean.
In general it seems that the idea is not to generate information  
related to document structure (as this should be inferred from pdf)
favoring appearance description.

Best

-a-




--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Università degli Studi di Torino
--> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/
--> andrea.valle@unito.it
--------------------------------------------------


I did this interview where I just mentioned that I read Foucault. Who  
doesn't in university, right? I was in this strip club giving this  
guy a lap dance and all he wanted to do was to discuss Foucault with  
me. Well, I can stand naked and do my little dance, or I can discuss  
Foucault, but not at the same time; too much information.
(Annabel Chong)