From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/59738 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Otared Kavian Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: latest beta has trouble with notes Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <89DBCBC6-D8D0-4EAA-A5CB-81A5E777AF8C@uni-bonn.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276965958 4801 80.91.229.12 (19 Jun 2010 16:45:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:45:58 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Jun 19 18:45:52 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ1Az-00044a-05 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EE3C9C01; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5-WIOf84q1az; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:46 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035F9C9B8F; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4EBC9B8F for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9hDkfTdln25H for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11360C9AF9 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:45:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so53395wwc.14 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=g0GZ/x3dc6YBFdMyS+QFDyBVLgL93Vr0pY8hVJGIlwM=; b=ZmmIpLQJGIJJLLGWi8Q9D/cuDCKemHxLmA2UAkQQ/6K27nG38MdL/A/Vq7Im1s3gch k5cT6nCLNSlEbjIlhktpyA59wSiObw5V7jXPAbItg4L4Uo+kv13QdY3OidDqjmel0igH 8m8LHAo2v4N9sfbSdOMMZsPMRhFdLJzvuxnPQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=ohdnMkwgLPD1ElpfHiiHazgHFCuSCszVT35VVyzJ/3Bf1lirkx9wLnCRLsxVe2xkI6 06Yf8i4c1E+KArdZBUA2B1JghF455hzdvEMkjGXGkiNXNchzsICNqoGG3Yq0c6W2KDHp 8gEG92lhZS4VIEbD7W/uoY2u9neQuVVmdzitc= Original-Received: by 10.227.69.71 with SMTP id y7mr2536364wbi.123.1276965938891; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.29] (54.24.85-79.rev.gaoland.net [79.85.24.54]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm18584801wbd.7.2010.06.19.09.45.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:45:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <89DBCBC6-D8D0-4EAA-A5CB-81A5E777AF8C@uni-bonn.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:59738 Archived-At: Hi Thomas, I was just writing a message about this bug when I received your message=85= So, I can confirm. Best regards: OK On 19 juin 2010, at 18:32, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, = > = > not sure if this has been reported yet, but yesterday's beta has a bug re= garding footnotes. Minimal example: > = > \starttext > = > One\footnote{One} > Two\footnote{Two} > = > \stoptext > = > The first footnote is repeated for every following note; other notes are = dropped. > = > All best > = > Thomas ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________