From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26457 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Weber Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Figure [left] Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:33:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142994857 16440 80.91.229.2 (22 Mar 2006 02:34:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Mar 22 03:34:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLtAp-0006zK-B1 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD861278E; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24504-05; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FED31277C; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAD81277C for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24722-03 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:03 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from plounts.uits.indiana.edu (plounts.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.73]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 09B5E12778 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:34:00 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-relay.iu.edu (stjoseph.uits.indiana.edu [129.79.1.78]) by plounts.uits.indiana.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/IUPO) with ESMTP id k2M2XvqA011111 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:33:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from [10.0.1.6] (dial-126-86.dial.indiana.edu [156.56.126.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail-relay.iu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/IUPO) with ESMTP id k2M2XrFV021276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:33:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26457 Archived-At: I don't know either what the goal is, when I want to place a figure left to the text I use \startfiguretext etc. Matthias On Mar 21, 2006, at 9:18 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > <--- On Mar 21, David Arnold wrote ---> > >> All, >> >> Both this: >> >> %output=pdf >> >> \starttext >> >> We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered >> pair}. If you think of the positions taken by >> \placefigure >> [left][fig:ordpair] >> {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} >> ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane >> (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why >> order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the >> same as >> the ordered pair $(2,4)$. >> >> \stoptext >> >> And this: >> >> %output=pdf >> >> \starttext >> >> We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered >> pair}. If you think of the positions taken by >> \placefigure >> [left][fig:ordpair] >> {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} >> ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane >> (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why >> order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the >> same as >> the ordered pair $(2,4)$. >> >> \stoptext >> >> Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior >> expected. Any >> ideas? > > I am not sure on what you want to achieve, but does this look better? > > \starttext > \placefigure > [left][fig:ordpair] > {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} > We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered > pair}. If you think of the positions taken by > ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane > (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why > order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same > as > the ordered pair $(2,4)$. > > \stoptext > > > HTH, > Aditya > > -- > Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan > http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008 > _______________________________________________ > ntg-context mailing list > ntg-context@ntg.nl > http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context