From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3753 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Dan Seracu" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: RE: changing columns Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:34:55 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <3.0.6.32.20001015213437.00ab15c0@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394472 19791 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:34:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: "NTG ConTeXt" , "Hans Hagen" In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001015213437.00ab15c0@pop.wxs.nl> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3753 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3753 Hello! I browsed the history of NTG Context I found this: > > in a next version there will be an alternative multi column > format with has > a better \column command [with args], with spanning page areas, more > extensive float controle, multiple column formats, etc, but this > will first > be tested in depth by taco cum suis in journal typesetting. > This would be nice, becaused I tried to typeset a magazine for a high school and after some time of TeX hacking I droped TeX (because of it's lack in multiple columns, spanning page areas etc.) So, if ConTeXt will have such a thing, then it will be GGGRRRREEEEAAAAT. IMHO. Question is, however, when. Dan Seracu