From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3529 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Petr Ferdus Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: unicode in bookmarks Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:58:38 +0100 (CET) Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <3.0.6.32.20001201183314.008ee4a0@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394259 17822 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:30:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001201183314.008ee4a0@pop.wxs.nl> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3529 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3529 On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Hans Hagen wrote: > For that, the unicode list should be extended, since i defined only a few > chars, I used rcaron letter to see what is going on and it behave partly the way I don't comprehend. It seems to write properly encoded octal representation of rcaron character to both annotation and bookmark objects, regardles the way I "defineaccent-ed" it. But in both cases, expected rcaron didn't show up in bookmark or annotation texts (there are dots instead of them). Secondly, used as regular text in pdf, both definitions of rcaron produced different results (\'r showed as racute, \v{r} showed as rcaron) The question is what makes presumably well written/encoded character not to show properly in bookmark/annotation. Second one would be how to efficiently write bookmark/ annot. string preferably as one character for each written character thus avoiding \'r or \v{r} way of writting them. Thank you for your patience. Peter source: http://vertigo.fme.vutbr.cz/~pferdus/context/test09a.tex pdf output: http://vertigo.fme.vutbr.cz/~pferdus/context/test09a.pdf