From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4894 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Petr Ferdus Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: typeseting XML - mixed buffers Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:41:02 +0200 (CEST) Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <3.0.6.32.20010627231604.015d0530@server-1> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395530 29695 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:52:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010627231604.015d0530@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4894 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4894 On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Hans Hagen wrote: > again this indictates that you process grouped. Actualy, there is no reason > to set footertexts each time, just set them up in the style. I would not touch footer text setting would it show up correctly.(It is set once at the begining of document) I started to fiddle with it when I could not have it right on certain pages (which happened to be generated from buffers containing XML) > Do you really need the buffers? Good question, next time I will do it differently, but in this particular case i tried to minimize touching the source code. >>From the other side, it would be nice to know I can use them - if needed (till I know better solution). BTW buffers with XML in it were quite sensitive to comments e.g. \startbuffer[bla]%comment here should not hurt actually hurts, if there is XML source in it(introduces some errors which disapear if the comment is removed). Peter