From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/4954 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tarik Kara Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: AMS font problem Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 11:45:40 +0300 (EET DST) Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <3B45C530.265543E6@elvenkind.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035395581 30098 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Taco Hoekwater In-Reply-To: <3B45C530.265543E6@elvenkind.com> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:4954 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:4954 Is this a bug in ConTeXt (the \mathbb command works finw with LaTeX)? Should I interchange all the msam with msbm in font-ams.tex? Thanks. Tar{\i}k On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > You are not, I think. It may be coincidental (but probably isn't) that > \gtreqless occupies the same position in msam10 as R does in msbm10 :-) > > > -- > groeten, > > Taco >