From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/6283 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "George N. White III" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: ConTeXt \insertpages problem with 1.00a-pretest-20010806-2.1 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:29:32 -0400 (AST) Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: "George N. White III" NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035396816 9101 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 18:13:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 18:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pdfTeX Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:6283 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:6283 We have pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.00a-pretest-20010806-2.1, running on SGI Irix. Some of our students prefer Win32, so we also have 4TeX with many local "enhancements" including current ConTeXt, Perl, and pdf(e)tex running on Win95. On the PC, files "placed" via \insertpages produce blank pages in the output PDF, but the same files work as expected using the Irix version. The Win95 version gives an "unrecognized token" error in acroread 4.05, and the pdf file is somewhat smaller than the version created using the Irix version. I made some simple test files with \pdfcompresslevel=0. Under Win95, the contents of the placed pages appears to be corrupt. Before doing anymore testing, it would help to know if anyone else has seen this problem (e.g., is there something wrong with our configuration or is it a bug in the Win32 binaries?). -- George N. White III Bedford Institute of Oceanography