From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26642 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: beta Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:17:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <442AAC0E.40906@wxs.nl> <442BA583.9030306@elvenkind.com> <442BE82D.1060903@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143737402 24481 80.91.229.2 (30 Mar 2006 16:50:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 30 18:49:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FP0L6-00061K-Si for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:49:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753B4126F8; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:49:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13180-07; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:49:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A86B12796; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:17:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E55812796 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:17:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12631-08-2 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:17:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from beyondborders.mr.itd.umich.edu (beyondborders.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.146]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B340126F8 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:17:27 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from eecs4327u02.engin.umich.edu (eecs4327u02.engin.umich.edu [141.213.51.130]) by beyondborders.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp) with ESMTP id k2UGHQjJ012468 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:17:27 -0500 X-X-Sender: adityam@eecs4327u02.engin.umich.edu Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <442BE82D.1060903@elvenkind.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26642 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> <--- On Mar 30, Taco Hoekwater wrote ---> >> >>> * The broken eq reference (at least IMO this is a bug) >>> \starttext >>> \placeformula[eqn1] >>> \startformula \startalign[n=1] a\\ \stopalign \stopformula >>> See \in[eqn1] >>> \stoptext >> >> I am not sure that this is a bug. Infact, I am not behaviour is >> expected. >> \placeformula[eq1] >> \startformula \startalign[n=1] >> a \\ >> b \\ >> \stopalign \stopformula >> What should \in[eqn1] refer to? The first eqn, the second, or both? > > Both, perhaps. But it could as well take the first one, or the last. > My rationale is: if there is a label given by the user, then > referring to that should resolve into something that is a valid link. > It is definately inconsistent to discard a supplied label because it's > contents may be unresolvable. I agree on that. The label must refer to something. However, explaining what it refers to can quickly get confusing. The numbering should remain consistent with or without the label. \placeformula[eq1] \startformula \startalign \NC a \NC b \NR \NC c \NC d \NR[+] \stopalign \stopformula The first equation should not be numbered. But then this is something like the "ugly loose label" in latex. And what about \placeformula[eq1] \startformula \startalign \NC a \NC b \NR \NC c \NC d \NR \stopalign \stopformula The numbering should be consistent with or without the label. Which means that there should be no numbering. What should the label refer to now? Aditya