From: Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: differences of perl/ruby texexec
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 14:17:05 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0705041415200.16185@rrpf4327h09.ratva.hzvpu.rqh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <232D0D32-865D-4129-AEF0-E98452885B24@fiee.net>
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Ahoi!
>
> While processing my LilyPond/ConTeXt songbook, I experience still the
> same behaviour as in 2006-10:
>
> The checking, if a LilyPond buffer/temp file has changed, works only
> with the old Perl texexec, the recent Ruby version creates/processes
> the files only if they're missing completely and then still
> uncomplete: after 20-some songs, some buffers get dropped, so that
> LilyPond score and ConTeXt lyrics don't match.
>
> But I can't simply use the Perl texexec, because that doesn't create
> table of contents and references. Besides being much slower.
>
> Looks like the workaround of first Perl, then Ruby gives the expected
> result, but it's an annoyance.
>
> Maybe it's only a problem of the LilyPond module, but I guess the
> filechange check is somehow broken in the Ruby version.
>
> What details should I provide to track the problem down?
I usually find the output of texmfstart --verbose texexec --verbose to be
useful in seeing what is going wrong. I think that the R module also uses
the --ifchanged switch. If something has broken, it will also affect the R
module.
Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-04 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-04 14:54 Henning Hraban Ramm
2007-05-04 18:17 ` Aditya Mahajan [this message]
2007-05-04 18:58 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2007-05-04 19:15 ` Aditya Mahajan
2007-05-04 19:50 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2007-05-04 20:42 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2007-05-04 21:03 ` Aditya Mahajan
2007-05-04 22:11 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.63.0705041415200.16185@rrpf4327h09.ratva.hzvpu.rqh \
--to=adityam@umich.edu \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).