From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3092 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Balazs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Too much betas with languages (long) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: References: <3.0.6.32.20001025100825.008e62d0@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393851 14217 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:24:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20001025100825.008e62d0@pop.wxs.nl> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3092 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3092 On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Hans Hagen wrote: > >> >- enco-pdf.tex addition: > >> > \defineaccent H U ^^db > >> > \defineaccent H u ^^fb > >> > \defineaccent H O ^^d5 > >> > \defineaccent H o ^^f5 This is missing from enco-il2.tex too. > eh, are you sure about enco-win? > > >This is tricky because Latin-1 and Latin-2 differs (in a Hungarian's > >point of view) in these changes, thus until there isn't a real Latin-2 > >support, an enco-hu.tex or enco-whu.tex can be a good choice. > > then, why not extent enco-il2? Because when I write Latin-2's 0xd5 character, I want TeX to convert it to \H O. -- Regards: Kevin (Balazs) IKSZ: szabad szerepjatek barmilyen helyszinre. http://www.iksz.hu/