From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/14738 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "William D. Neumann" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: t-nath difficulty Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:52:08 -0700 (MST) Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: References: <4031085F.2050605@iname.com> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076957733 21484 80.91.224.253 (16 Feb 2004 18:55:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Mon Feb 16 19:55:25 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Asnts-0001nd-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:55:24 +0100 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92E010B4B; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:53:39 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from mail.cs.unm.edu (medio.cs.unm.edu [64.106.20.40]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B7E10B38 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:52:40 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from alamogordo.cs.unm.edu ([64.106.21.107]) by mail.cs.unm.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Asnsl-0002zZ-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:54:15 -0700 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: <4031085F.2050605@iname.com> X-Scanner: exiscan *1Asnsl-0002zZ-00*02y1N1Wr30w* Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:14738 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:14738 On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Gary Pajer wrote: > In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the > second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct. > Bug or feature? or setup problem? > > \usemodule[nath] > \starttext > > $ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $ > > $ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $ > \stoptext What problem are you having? I tried this example and got the following output (only typset nicely, of course): y = (1 + (/a)b) y = (1 + a/b) Which appears to be the correct output. Are you using the current t-nath/t-amsl (from december 2003, I believe)? William D. Neumann --- "Well I could be a genius, if I just put my mind to it. And I...I could do anything, if only I could get 'round to it. Oh we were brought up on the space-race, now they expect you to clean toilets. When you've seen how big the world is, how can you make do with this? If you want me, I'll be sleeping in - sleeping in throughout these glory days." -- Jarvis Cocker