From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/13733 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "George N. White III" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: RME and INI Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 06:37:26 -0300 (ADT) Sender: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1065433402 15450 80.91.224.253 (6 Oct 2003 09:43:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl Mon Oct 06 11:43:21 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from ref.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.13] helo=ref.ntg.nl) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A6Rth-0008T4-00 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2003 11:43:21 +0200 Original-Received: from ref.ntg.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B9710B04; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:43:15 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from halifax.chebucto.ns.ca (chebucto.ns.Ca [192.75.95.75]) by ref.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F397D10B04 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 11:36:50 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from Dyip-193.chebucto.ns.Ca ([192.75.95.193]:33355 "EHLO cerberus.cwmannwn.nowhere") by halifax.chebucto.ns.ca with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 06:36:37 -0300 X-X-Sender: gwhite@cerberus.cwmannwn.nowhere Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-admin@ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk X-Reply-To: "George N. White III" List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:13733 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:13733 On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Pawel Jackowski na Onet wrote: > Hi all! > > TEXEXEC documentation and self documented 'texexec.rme' file says that it > should be copied to 'texexec.ini'. First of all; I have two 'texexec.rme' in > TeX tree; first in > > ...TeX/context/config > > the second in > > ...TeX/context/perltk > > Files looks to be identical but and the second location has a priority. But > which location is more convenient for texexec config file? You should put 'texexec.ini' in a "local" tree, e.g., texmf-local, so it is easy to find when you upgrade, e.g., "texmf-local/context/config" > The second question is WHY I have to copy 'texexec.rme' to 'texexec.ini'? If > I do so and change some settings in 'texexec.ini' and than run > 'texexec --verbose', I can see that settings are still taken from > 'texexec.rme'. Could You tell me what is the point in copying RME to INI and > when INI file is used instead RME? Did you run mktexlsr? What do you get from: 'kpsewhich -progname=context -format="other text files" texexec.ini'? -- George N. White III