From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/18253 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Peter_M=FCnster?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Widows, flush bottom, and word breaks Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:08:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <000901c51120$cfe600b0$6502a8c0@jlyond800> <20050212193332.1771@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108242926 7119 80.91.229.2 (12 Feb 2005 21:15:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Feb 12 22:15:26 2005 Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D04bd-00023g-P1 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:15:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC3D127E3; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22614-06; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:10 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C77127B1; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7330C127B1 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ronja.vet.uu.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22705-02-2 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28DA12792 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from gaston.free.fr (rennes-1-62-147-96-127.dial.proxad.net [62.147.96.127]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A99C28C293 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:17:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by gaston.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1ADF313C047; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:08:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaston.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132135B8107 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:08:27 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: peter@gaston.free.fr Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <20050212193332.1771@mail.comp.lancs.ac.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-MailScanner-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-MailScanner-To: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:18253 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:18253 On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Adam Lindsay wrote: > >2. How can I turn on \flushbottom (LaTeX command) to space lines *insi= de* > >paragraphs but not *between* paragraphs? >=20 > I'm not sure. Peter M=FCnster's email helped me understand the problem = a > little more, but I think he misinterpreted your lines vs paragraphs > directive. Yes indeed. I thought of the LaTeX command only... > \setupinterlinespace[stretch=3D0.08] % experimentation needed! I'm also very interested in these kinds of problems (and solutions ;). It seems to me, that with this parameter, interline-spaces can get smalle= r but not bigger. (I've just tried the example on http://contextgarden.net/Flush_bottom) Could you explain this parameter a bit further? > \setuptolerance[vertical,verystrict] I know the meaning of strict and tolerant in horizontal context, but what does it mean in vertical context? I didn't see any difference between \setuptolerance[vertical,verystrict] and \setuptolerance[vertical,verytolerant] Thanks in advance for further comments! We can put it on the wiki then. Cheers, Peter --=20 http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/