itemize question

itemize question

[Peter Münster]

Hello,
is it normal, that the first "margin=5em" is not taken into account, but
the with \setupitemize it works?

Perhaps I misunderstand the second argument of \startitemize.

\starttext
\startitemize[packed][margin=5em]
\item bla
\item bla
\stopitemize

\setupitemize[margin=5em]
\startitemize[packed]
\item bla
\item bla
\stopitemize
\stoptext

Cheers, Peter

-- 
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/

Re: itemize question

[Hans Hagen]

� wrote:
> Hello,
> is it normal, that the first "margin=5em" is not taken into account, but
> the with \setupitemize it works?
>
> Perhaps I misunderstand the second argument of \startitemize.
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[packed][margin=5em]
> \item bla
> \item bla
> \stopitemize
>
> \setupitemize[margin=5em]
> \startitemize[packed]
> \item bla
> \item bla
> \stopitemize
> \stoptext
>   
ok, fixed

Hans 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

itemize question

[Patrick Gundlach]

Hi,

I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.

Patrick
--------------------------------------------------

\starttext 
\setupitemize[2][packed]
\startitemize [n]
\item eins
\item zwei
\startitemize 
\item dies
\item dies
\item das
\stopitemize
\item und drei
\stopitemize


\setupitemize[1][packed]
\startitemize [n]
\item eins
\item zwei
\startitemize 
\item dies
\item dies
\item das
\stopitemize
\item und drei
\stopitemize
\stoptext
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: itemize question

[Aditya Mahajan]

Quoting Patrick Gundlach <patrick@gundla.ch>:

> Hi,
>
> I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
> IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.
>
> Patrick
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> \starttext
> \setupitemize[2][packed]
[...]
> \setupitemize[1][packed]

so in this example both are packed :)

> \startitemize [n]
> \item eins
> \item zwei
> \startitemize
> \item dies
> \item dies
> \item das
> \stopitemize
> \item und drei
> \stopitemize
> \stoptext

Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for 
each level.  So, only way around is to use an explicit unpacked 
somewhere, e.g.,

\setupitemize[each][unpacked]
\setupitemize[1][packed]

Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: itemize question

[Patrick Gundlach]

Hi Aditya,


>> \starttext
>> \setupitemize[2][packed]
> [...]
>> \setupitemize[1][packed]
>
> so in this example both are packed :)

Right after sending my mail I realized that this could be used against
me :)

> Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for 
> each level.  So, only way around is to use an explicit unpacked 
> somewhere, e.g.,
>
> \setupitemize[each][unpacked]
> \setupitemize[1][packed]


OK, I see. Is this a feature or a (I don't dare to use the b.. word)?

Thanks,

Patrick
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: itemize question

[Aditya Mahajan]

Quoting Patrick Gundlach <patrick@gundla.ch>:

>> Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for
>> each level.  So, only way around is to use an explicit unpacked
>> somewhere, e.g.,
>>
>> \setupitemize[each][unpacked]
>> \setupitemize[1][packed]
>
>
> OK, I see. Is this a feature or a (I don't dare to use the b.. word)?

I would call it a feature, simply because when I use packed I want all 
levels to be packed. :)

Here is another feature which I found accidentally by forgetting a 
\stopitemize.

\startitemize[n]
\item one
\subject {Between}
\item two
\stopitemize

Aditya
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________