From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31003 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Peter_M=FCnster?= Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: does metafun require texexec --final? Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <4516DE5F.2060605@wxs.nl> Reply-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159253221 25560 80.91.229.2 (26 Sep 2006 06:47:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:47:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Sep 26 08:46:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GS6iO-0006gL-0h for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0891FDDE; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29482-02; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D821FE03; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402461FE03 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 28358-06 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp.cegetel.net (mf00.sitadelle.com [212.94.174.67]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 548161FDDE for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from gaston.pm (unknown [84.7.255.220]) by smtp.cegetel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6643E1A47C7 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:46:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by gaston.pm (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5E5B413C01A; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaston.pm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FAC148016 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:32:13 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: peter@gaston.pm Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <4516DE5F.2060605@wxs.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31003 Archived-At: On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Hans Hagen wrote: > > Oh, that's not a good idea, because the next context update will > > overwrite cont-sys.rme. So I should copy cont-sys.rme to cont-sys.tex > > first, then uncomment the lines in cont-sys.tex. But then a context > > update will overwrite cont-sys.rme, and the new version will be > > ignored because I have a cont-sys.tex. > > > right, that's the idea ; just occasionally peek in the shipped > cont-sys.rme to see if something important came up ... not that frequently What do you think about a cont-sys.tex like this: \input cont-sys.rme \runMPgraphicstrue \runMPTEXgraphicstrue \endinput ? Cheers, Peter -- http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/