From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/615 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthew Baker Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Different images for screen and printing Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:25:09 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: Reply-To: Matthew.Baker@gmd.de NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391468 25625 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:44:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: Context List Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:615 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:615 Hi all, The more I think about the concept Hans suggested about having different images for viewing on screen and printing, the more I like the idea :) I have some documents which include vector PDF diagrams. These look good on a 300dpi or 600dpi printer but are very aliased on screen. Since they are colour, Acrobat does no anti-aliasing. I'd rather not include images in their place as the vector versions look good in print. Therefore, it would be really good to include them as JPEGs for viewing on screen and as PDFs for printing. Does the plan cater for images of different type, or just different resolution? That would really put my presentations ahead of the PowerPoint ones everyone else here seems to do. (That and the good maths and the fact that an entire presentation can fit on a floppy.) - Matthew -- Dr. Matthew Baker matthew.baker@gmd.de GMD - FIT.MMK http://fit.gmd.de/hci/pages/matthew.baker.html