From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26456 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Figure [left] Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:18:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142993900 13851 80.91.229.2 (22 Mar 2006 02:18:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 02:18:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Mar 22 03:18:17 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLsvR-00051U-Ew for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D117912783; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:16 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24504-02; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B731277C; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E291277C for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 24166-06 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:09 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from beyondborders.mr.itd.umich.edu (beyondborders.mr.itd.umich.edu [141.211.93.146]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id A013112778 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 03:18:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from aditya.annarb01.mi.comcast.net (c-68-40-50-205.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.50.205]) by beyondborders.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp) with ESMTP id k2M2I6A0025131 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:18:06 -0500 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26456 Archived-At: <--- On Mar 21, David Arnold wrote ---> > All, > > Both this: > > %output=pdf > > \starttext > > We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered > pair}. If you think of the positions taken by > \placefigure > [left][fig:ordpair] > {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} > ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane > (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why > order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as > the ordered pair $(2,4)$. > > \stoptext > > And this: > > %output=pdf > > \starttext > > We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered > pair}. If you think of the positions taken by > \placefigure > [left][fig:ordpair] > {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} > ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane > (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why > order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as > the ordered pair $(2,4)$. > > \stoptext > > Lead to the same attached result. This is not the behavior expected. Any > ideas? I am not sure on what you want to achieve, but does this look better? \starttext \placefigure [left][fig:ordpair] {}{\externalfigure[section1figs-mpgraph.1]} We use the notation $(2,4)$ to denote what is called an {\em ordered pair}. If you think of the positions taken by ordered pairs $(4,2)$ and $(2,4)$ in the coordinate plane (see \in{Figure}[fig:ordpair]), then it is immediately apparent why order is important. The ordered pair $(4,2)$ is simply not the same as the ordered pair $(2,4)$. \stoptext HTH, Aditya -- Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008