* extentable arrows @ 2006-06-28 20:56 Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 21:24 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 21:58 ` Taco Hoekwater 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi, Does ConTeXt have anything equivalent to xleftarrow, xrightarrow of amsmath. Basically, I need a command that can do A \xleftarrow[subscript]{superscript} B should give superscript A <----------- B subscript and similar for xrightarrow, xleftrightarrow, xLeftarrow, xRightarrow and xLeftRightarrow. The closest that I could come to it was (only for superscripts) \def\xrightarrow#1{\buildrel{#1}\over\longrightarrow} But this is not extendable. \xrightarrow{big superscipt} Any suggestions? Aditya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 20:56 extentable arrows Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 21:24 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 21:58 ` Taco Hoekwater 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > Hi, > Does ConTeXt have anything equivalent to xleftarrow, xrightarrow of > amsmath. Basically, I need a command that can do > > A \xleftarrow[subscript]{superscript} B > > should give > > superscript > A <----------- B > subscript > > and similar for xrightarrow, xleftrightarrow, xLeftarrow, xRightarrow > and xLeftRightarrow. > > > The closest that I could come to it was (only for superscripts) > > \def\xrightarrow#1{\buildrel{#1}\over\longrightarrow} > > But this is not extendable. > > \xrightarrow{big superscipt} > > > Any suggestions? This is how it is defined in amsmath.sty \def\ext@arrow#1#2#3#4#5#6#7{% \mathrel{\mathop{% \setbox\z@\hbox{#5\displaystyle}% \setbox\tw@\vbox{\m@th \hbox{$\scriptstyle\mkern#3mu{#6}\mkern#4mu$}% \hbox{$\scriptstyle\mkern#3mu{#7}\mkern#4mu$}% \copy\z@ }% \hbox to\wd\tw@{\unhbox\z@}}% \limits \@ifnotempty{#7}{^{\if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi #7\if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi}}% \@ifnotempty{#6}{_{\if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi #6\if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi}}}% } \newcommand{\xrightarrow}[2][]{\ext@arrow 0359\rightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \newcommand{\xleftarrow}[2][]{\ext@arrow 3095\leftarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} I tried to contextify this, but keep on getting missing $ errors. Aditya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 20:56 extentable arrows Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 21:24 ` Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 21:58 ` Taco Hoekwater 2006-06-28 23:07 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 23:21 ` Aditya Mahajan 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-06-28 21:58 UTC (permalink / raw) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > \xrightarrow{big superscipt} > > Any suggestions? Not completely identical, but similar. Cheers, Taco \def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7% {\begingroup \mathsurround\zeropoint \setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi \mkern#3mu#7\mkern#4mu \if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi $}% \setbox4\hbox{#5}% \dimen0\wd0 \ifdim\wd4>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd4 \fi \setbox2\hbox{$\scriptstyle \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi \mkern#3mu#6\mkern#4mu \if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi $}% \ifdim\wd2>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd2 \fi \setbox4\hbox to \dimen0{#5}% \mathord{\vcenter{{\offinterlineskip \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\box0\hss}% \kern .2ex \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\copy4\hss}% \kern .2ex \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\box2\hss}}}}% \endgroup} \def\xrightarrow{\dodoubleempty\doxrightarrow } \def\xleftarrow {\dodoubleempty\doxleftarrow } \def\doxrightarrow[#1][#2]{\mathrel {{\domthxarr0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} \def\doxleftarrow[#1][#2]{\mathrel {{\domthxarr3095\leftarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} \starttext $$ A \xrightarrow[][stuff on top] B $$ $$ A \xleftarrow[stuff below][stuff on top] B $$ $$ A \xleftarrow B $$ \stoptext ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 21:58 ` Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-06-28 23:07 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-29 9:02 ` Hans Hagen 2006-06-28 23:21 ` Aditya Mahajan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw) On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> \xrightarrow{big superscipt} >> >> Any suggestions? > > > Not completely identical, but similar. > > Cheers, Taco > > > \def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7% > {\begingroup > \mathsurround\zeropoint > \setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle > \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi > \mkern#3mu#7\mkern#4mu > \if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi $}% > \setbox4\hbox{#5}% > \dimen0\wd0 > \ifdim\wd4>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd4 \fi > \setbox2\hbox{$\scriptstyle > \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi > \mkern#3mu#6\mkern#4mu > \if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi $}% > \ifdim\wd2>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd2 \fi > \setbox4\hbox to \dimen0{#5}% > \mathord{\vcenter{{\offinterlineskip > \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\box0\hss}% > \kern .2ex > \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\copy4\hss}% > \kern .2ex > \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\box2\hss}}}}% > \endgroup} > > \def\xrightarrow{\dodoubleempty\doxrightarrow } > > \def\xleftarrow {\dodoubleempty\doxleftarrow } > > \def\doxrightarrow[#1][#2]{\mathrel > {{\domthxarr0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} > > \def\doxleftarrow[#1][#2]{\mathrel > {{\domthxarr3095\leftarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} Thanks Taco! However, the arrow is not centered when there is only subscript or superscript. Compare the height of arrows in the following. $$ \rightarrow A \xrightarrow[][stuff on top] B \leftarrow $$ $$ \rightarrow A \xleftarrow[stuff below][] B \leftarrow $$ How about, \def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7% {\begingroup \mathsurround\zeropoint \setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi \mkern#3mu#7\mkern#4mu \if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi $}% \setbox4\hbox{#5}% \dimen0\wd0 \ifdim\wd4>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd4 \fi \setbox2\hbox{$\scriptstyle \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi \mkern#3mu#6\mkern#4mu \if0#2\else\mkern#2mu\fi $}% \ifdim\wd2>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd2 \fi \setbox4\hbox to \dimen0{#5}% \mathrel{\mathop{% \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\copy4\hss}}% \limits^{\box0}_{\box2}} % \mathord{\vcenter{{\offinterlineskip % \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\box0\hss}% % \kern .2ex % \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\copy4\hss}% % \kern .2ex % \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\box2\hss}}}}% \endgroup} I am simply trying to copy from amsmath definition. Aditya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 23:07 ` Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-29 9:02 ` Hans Hagen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen @ 2006-06-29 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > I am simply trying to copy from amsmath definition. > better think context -) \unprotect \def\mtharrfactor{1} \def\mtharrextra {0} \def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8% {\begingroup \def\mtharrfactor{1}% \def\mtharrextra {0}% \processaction[#1] % will be sped up [ \v!none=>\def\mtharrfactor{0}, \v!small=>\def\mtharrextra{10}, \v!medium=>\def\mtharrextra{15}, \v!big=>\def\mtharrextra{20}, \v!normal=>, \v!default=>, \v!unknown=>\doifnumberelse{#1}{\def\mtharrextra{#1}}\donothing]% \mathsurround\zeropoint \muskip0=#4mu \muskip0=\mtharrfactor\muskip0 \advance\muskip0 \mtharrextra mu \muskip2=#5mu \muskip2=\mtharrfactor\muskip2 \advance\muskip2 \mtharrextra mu \setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle \if#20\else\mkern#2mu\fi \mkern\muskip0\relax #8\relax \mkern\muskip2\relax \if#30\else\mkern#3mu\fi $}% \setbox4\hbox{#6}% \dimen0\wd0 \ifdim\wd4>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd4 \fi \setbox2\hbox{$\scriptstyle \if#20\else\mkern#2mu\fi \mkern\muskip0\relax #7\relax \mkern\muskip2\relax \if#30\else\mkern#3mu\fi $}% \ifdim\wd2>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd2 \fi \setbox4\hbox to \dimen0{#6}% \mathrel{\mathop{% \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\copy4\hss}}% \limits^{\box0}_{\box2}} \endgroup} % ams: \def\xrightarrow{\doifnextcharelse[\noxrightarrow\doxrightarrow} \def\xleftarrow {\doifnextcharelse[\noxleftarrow\doxleftarrow} \def\doxrightarrow{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow} \def\doxleftarrow {\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow } \def\noxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} \def\noxleftarrow [#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow {#1}} \def\dodoxrightarrow#2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{}0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} \def\dodoxleftarrow #2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{}3095\leftarrowfill {#1}{#2}}}} % context: \def\xrightarrow {\dosingleempty\doxrightarrow} \def\xleftarrow {\dosingleempty\doxleftarrow} \def\doxrightarrow[#1]{\dotriplegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} \def\doxleftarrow [#1]{\dotriplegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow {#1}} \def\dodoxrightarrow#1#2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{#1}0359\rightarrowfill{#2}{#3}}}} \def\dodoxleftarrow #1#2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{#1}3095\leftarrowfill {#2}{#3}}}} \starttext \startformula \xrightarrow{}{stuff on top}\stopformula \startformula \xrightarrow{stuff below}{}\stopformula \startformula \xrightarrow{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula \startformula \xleftarrow [none]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula \startformula \xleftarrow [small]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula \startformula \xleftarrow [medium]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula \startformula \xleftarrow [big]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula \stoptext ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 21:58 ` Taco Hoekwater 2006-06-28 23:07 ` Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 23:21 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-29 8:07 ` Taco Hoekwater 2006-06-29 8:25 ` Hans Hagen 1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-28 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw) On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> \xrightarrow{big superscipt} >> >> Any suggestions? > > > Not completely identical, but similar. The syntax can be made identical (even better) than that of amsmath. \def\xrightarrow{\dosingleempty\doxrightarrow} \def\xleftarrow {\dosingleempty\doxleftarrow} \def\doxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} \def\doxleftarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow{#1}} \def\dodoxrightarrow#1#2{\mathrel {{\domthxarr0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} \def\dodoxleftarrow#1#2{\mathrel {{\domthxarr3095\leftarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} \starttext $$ A \xrightarrow[]{stuff on top} B $$ $$ A \xrightarrow[stuff below]{} B $$ \startformula A \xleftarrow[stuff below]{stuff on top} B \stopformula $$ A \xleftarrow B $$ $$ \rightarrow A \xrightarrow{stuff on top} B \leftarrow $$ $$ \rightarrow A \xleftarrow[stuff below] B \leftarrow $$ \stoptext Will make copy paste a bit easier! Though these days I find myself writing more in context and soon will face the reverse problem. I will need to copy context math into latex (needed for final journal submission) and some of the math features are simply missing from latex :) Aditya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 23:21 ` Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-29 8:07 ` Taco Hoekwater 2006-06-29 8:25 ` Hans Hagen 1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-06-29 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > >>Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> >>>\xrightarrow{big superscipt} >>> >>>Any suggestions? >> >> >>Not completely identical, but similar. > > > The syntax can be made identical (even better) than that of amsmath. Perhaps it syntax should be identical to amsmath: no brackets and two required arguments. It is what is expected anyway. \def\xrightarrow#1#2{\mathrel {{\domthxarr0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} I assume amsmath has a few others as well, for double arrows and such. Can you post those defs as well? Then we can move the whole definition into math-ext.tex for the new release Cheers, Taco ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-28 23:21 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-29 8:07 ` Taco Hoekwater @ 2006-06-29 8:25 ` Hans Hagen 2006-06-29 14:56 ` Aditya Mahajan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Hans Hagen @ 2006-06-29 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > The syntax can be made identical (even better) than that of amsmath. > > \def\xrightarrow{\dosingleempty\doxrightarrow} > > \def\xleftarrow {\dosingleempty\doxleftarrow} > > \def\doxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} > > \def\doxleftarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow{#1}} > > \def\dodoxrightarrow#1#2{\mathrel > {{\domthxarr0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} > > \def\dodoxleftarrow#1#2{\mathrel > {{\domthxarr3095\leftarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} > > \starttext > $$ > A \xrightarrow[]{stuff on top} B > $$ > > $$ > A \xrightarrow[stuff below]{} B > $$ > > \startformula > A \xleftarrow[stuff below]{stuff on top} B > \stopformula > > $$ > A \xleftarrow B > $$ > $$ > \rightarrow A \xrightarrow{stuff on top} B \leftarrow > $$ > > > $$ > \rightarrow A \xleftarrow[stuff below] B \leftarrow > $$ > > \stoptext > hm, this is not the context way, two equal kind of contents and then one of them in [], maybe \def\xrightarrow{\doifnextcharelse[\noxrightarrow\doxrightarrow} \def\xleftarrow {\doifnextcharelse[\noxleftarrow\doxleftarrow} \def\doxrightarrow{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow} \def\doxleftarrow {\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow } \def\noxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} \def\noxleftarrow [#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow {#1}} which accepts \xrightarrow{x}{y} \xrightarrow{x} \xrightarrow{}{y} \xrightarrow[x]{y} etc, actyally, we should then also accept \xrightarrow[x][y] but more interesting is to use the optional arg for tuning purposes \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi test, does a \mkern0mu hurt? > > Will make copy paste a bit easier! Though these days I find myself > writing more in context and soon will face the reverse problem. I will > need to copy context math into latex (needed for final journal > submission) and some of the math features are simply missing from > latex :) > Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl ----------------------------------------------------------------- ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: extentable arrows 2006-06-29 8:25 ` Hans Hagen @ 2006-06-29 14:56 ` Aditya Mahajan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Aditya Mahajan @ 2006-06-29 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Hans Hagen wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> >> I am simply trying to copy from amsmath definition. >> > > better think context -) > > \unprotect > > \def\mtharrfactor{1} > \def\mtharrextra {0} > > \def\domthxarr#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8% > {\begingroup > \def\mtharrfactor{1}% > \def\mtharrextra {0}% > \processaction[#1] % will be sped up > [ \v!none=>\def\mtharrfactor{0}, > \v!small=>\def\mtharrextra{10}, > \v!medium=>\def\mtharrextra{15}, > \v!big=>\def\mtharrextra{20}, > \v!normal=>, > \v!default=>, > \v!unknown=>\doifnumberelse{#1}{\def\mtharrextra{#1}}\donothing]% > \mathsurround\zeropoint > \muskip0=#4mu \muskip0=\mtharrfactor\muskip0 \advance\muskip0 \mtharrextra mu > \muskip2=#5mu \muskip2=\mtharrfactor\muskip2 \advance\muskip2 \mtharrextra mu > \setbox0\hbox{$\scriptstyle > \if#20\else\mkern#2mu\fi > \mkern\muskip0\relax > #8\relax > \mkern\muskip2\relax > \if#30\else\mkern#3mu\fi > $}% > \setbox4\hbox{#6}% > \dimen0\wd0 > \ifdim\wd4>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd4 \fi > \setbox2\hbox{$\scriptstyle > \if#20\else\mkern#2mu\fi > \mkern\muskip0\relax > #7\relax > \mkern\muskip2\relax > \if#30\else\mkern#3mu\fi > $}% > \ifdim\wd2>\dimen0 \dimen0\wd2 \fi > \setbox4\hbox to \dimen0{#6}% > \mathrel{\mathop{% > \hbox to \dimen0{\hss\copy4\hss}}% > \limits^{\box0}_{\box2}} > \endgroup} > > % ams: > > \def\xrightarrow{\doifnextcharelse[\noxrightarrow\doxrightarrow} > \def\xleftarrow {\doifnextcharelse[\noxleftarrow\doxleftarrow} > > \def\doxrightarrow{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow} > \def\doxleftarrow {\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow } > > \def\noxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} > \def\noxleftarrow [#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow {#1}} > > \def\dodoxrightarrow#2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{}0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} > \def\dodoxleftarrow #2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{}3095\leftarrowfill {#1}{#2}}}} > > % context: > > \def\xrightarrow {\dosingleempty\doxrightarrow} > \def\xleftarrow {\dosingleempty\doxleftarrow} > > \def\doxrightarrow[#1]{\dotriplegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} > \def\doxleftarrow [#1]{\dotriplegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow {#1}} > > \def\dodoxrightarrow#1#2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{#1}0359\rightarrowfill{#2}{#3}}}} > \def\dodoxleftarrow #1#2#3{\mathrel{{\domthxarr{#1}3095\leftarrowfill {#2}{#3}}}} > > \starttext > > \startformula \xrightarrow{}{stuff on top}\stopformula > \startformula \xrightarrow{stuff below}{}\stopformula > \startformula \xrightarrow{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula > > \startformula \xleftarrow [none]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula > \startformula \xleftarrow [small]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula > \startformula \xleftarrow [medium]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula > \startformula \xleftarrow [big]{stuff below}{stuff on top}\stopformula > > \stoptext This definitely looks better. Can there be a setting for \setuparrowextension (or something) so that the default can be changed. On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Perhaps it syntax should be identical to amsmath: no brackets > and two required arguments. But that is not the amsmath syntax. It has \xrightarrow[below]{top} where the first argument is optional. > It is what is expected anyway. > > \def\xrightarrow#1#2{\mathrel > {{\domthxarr0359\rightarrowfill{#1}{#2}}}} > I agree that this makes more sense. > I assume amsmath has a few others as well, for double arrows and such. > Can you post those defs as well? Then we can move the whole definition > into math-ext.tex for the new release > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Hans Hagen wrote: > hm, this is not the context way, two equal kind of contents and then one > of them in [], maybe I agree. To me, \xrightarrow[setting]{below}{top} makes most sense. It is not same as ams syntax, but that does not matter too much. Maybe there can be a switch to enable ams type of syntax, but that will make things too messy, I guess. > > \def\xrightarrow{\doifnextcharelse[\noxrightarrow\doxrightarrow} > \def\xleftarrow {\doifnextcharelse[\noxleftarrow\doxleftarrow} > > \def\doxrightarrow{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow} > \def\doxleftarrow {\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow } > > \def\noxrightarrow[#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxrightarrow{#1}} > \def\noxleftarrow [#1]{\dodoublegroupempty\dodoxleftarrow {#1}} > > which accepts > > \xrightarrow{x}{y} > \xrightarrow{x} > \xrightarrow{}{y} > \xrightarrow[x]{y} > > etc, actyally, we should then also accept > > \xrightarrow[x][y] > > but more interesting is to use the optional arg for tuning purposes > > > \if0#1\else\mkern#1mu\fi > > test, does a \mkern0mu hurt? I did not see any difference when I tested it. I do not know why that is there. On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > I assume amsmath has a few others as well, for double arrows and > such. Can you post those defs as well? Then we can move the whole > definition into math-ext.tex for the new release These are the only ones defined in amsmath. However extarrows.sty defines the following \xlongequal (===) \xLongleftarrow (<===) (Perhaps a better name is \xLeftarrow and we can have \xLeftarrow[medium] ) \xLongrightarrow (===>) (Perhaps a better name is \xRightarrow?) \xLongleftrightarrow (<=====>) (again, \xLeftrightarrow[medium] ) \xLeftrightarrow ( <===> ) \xlongleftrightarrow (<------->) (again \xleftrightarrow[medium] ) \xleftrightarrow (<---->) \xlongleftarrow \xlongrightarrow (These two are there with \xrightarrow[medium]) The definitions in extarrows are \def\x@arrow{\DOTSB\Relbar} \def\xlongequalsignfill@{\arrowfill@\x@arrow\Relbar\x@arrow} \newcommand{\xlongequal}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xlongequalsignfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xLongleftrightarrowfill@{% \arrowfill@\Longleftarrow\Relbar\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\xLongleftrightarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xLongleftrightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xlongleftrightarrowfill@{% \arrowfill@\longleftarrow\relbar\longrightarrow} \newcommand{\xlongleftrightarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xlongleftrightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xLeftrightarrowfill@{\arrowfill@\Leftarrow\Relbar\Rightarrow} \newcommand{\xLeftrightarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xLeftrightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xleftrightarrowfill@{\arrowfill@\leftarrow\relbar\rightarrow} \newcommand{\xleftrightarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xleftrightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xLongleftarrowfill@{\arrowfill@\Longleftarrow\Relbar\Relbar} \newcommand{\xLongleftarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xLongleftarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xLongrightarrowfill@{\arrowfill@\Relbar\Relbar\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\xLongrightarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xLongrightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xlongleftarrowfill@{\arrowfill@\longleftarrow\relbar\relbar} \newcommand{\xlongleftarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xlongleftarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} \def\xlongrightarrowfill@{\arrowfill@\relbar\relbar\longrightarrow} \newcommand{\xlongrightarrow}[2][]{% \ext@arrow 0099\xlongrightarrowfill@{#1}{#2}} I do not think that change is syntax is that big a deal, as long as it is documented (I will do that). Otherwise we will still be using latex syntax here :) Aditya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-29 14:56 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-06-28 20:56 extentable arrows Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 21:24 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-28 21:58 ` Taco Hoekwater 2006-06-28 23:07 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-29 9:02 ` Hans Hagen 2006-06-28 23:21 ` Aditya Mahajan 2006-06-29 8:07 ` Taco Hoekwater 2006-06-29 8:25 ` Hans Hagen 2006-06-29 14:56 ` Aditya Mahajan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).