From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30299 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: compiling project files Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:29:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <221cc89e0608090852s616e2ecag3a8e21cd3b679b02@mail.gmail.com> <221cc89e0608122039vb9709e3oc232ffd2f00f011c@mail.gmail.com> <651881340608151316y77c9776fucd7f8ac8d2ff95ac@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1155673790 20664 80.91.229.2 (15 Aug 2006 20:29:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Aug 15 22:29:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GD5XW-000195-2W for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810DC1FE31; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32637-10-3; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441BE1FE2E; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CA91FE2E for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32637-10-2 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.82]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 22B621FE2D for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:29:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: FROM aditya.annarb01.mi.comcast.net (c-68-40-50-205.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.50.205]) BY hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 44E22E9A.6AB65.25837 ; 15 Aug 2006 16:29:14 -0400 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <651881340608151316y77c9776fucd7f8ac8d2ff95ac@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30299 Archived-At: On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Boris Tschirschwitz wrote: > Let's say I have the following project structure > > project.tex > env.tex > product1.tex > component1.tex > component2.tex > product2.tex > > Here, really, the whole project generates a single pdf at the end. > > Now, when working on component1, I would run > $ texmfstart texexec project.tex > > Should I rather run texexec on product1.tex or component1.tex? Or maybe u= se > texmfstart in some other way? You should run texexec on prouct or component (not on the project) > I am wondering about this because > 1. Perter says > > Only components and products should be compiled. Suppose you are typesetting a collection of books. Then project.tex = should have common setup for all the books. product1.tex can be first = book, product2.tex can be second book etc. component1.tex can be first = chapter of the first book, etc. So, you are not supposed to compile = the complete project. > 2. When compiling projects that include MPgraphics, I have to run that > texmfstart line > above twice to see changes to MPgraphics in my pdf. I thought = that one > idea behind > texexec is that it takes care of all incantations, like "make" in > programming. > This should not happen. Aditya > > > On 8/14/06, Peter M=FCnster wrote: >> = >> On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Derek Schmidt wrote: >> = >> > The .tuo file for the _product_ file shows the files being loaded. >> > Compiling the _project_ file yields no .tuo. My product file does >> > indeed look like what you wrote. >> = >> Hello Derek, >> it's not intended to compile the project file. It should contain only >> common setups for all products. >> Only components and products should be compiled. >> Cheers, Peter >> = >> -- >> http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/ >> _______________________________________________ >> ntg-context mailing list >> ntg-context@ntg.nl >> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >> = > -- = Aditya Mahajan, EECS Systems, University of Michigan http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~adityam || Ph: 7342624008