From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/31387 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aditya Mahajan Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: bug in beta: extra \else Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:06:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <452C1937.1050208@seznam.cz> <452CA17A.2030707@wxs.nl> <452CCA7D.4050309@seznam.cz> <452D48B7.9050704@wxs.nl> <45300908.9050400@seznam.cz> <20061014173511.089d6d95.schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> <45312554.4080505@wxs.nl> <4532AF5B.2090007@seznam.cz> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161012649 28212 80.91.229.2 (16 Oct 2006 15:30:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Oct 16 17:30:45 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZUQA-0008Fe-SP for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:30:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6641FCD9; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:30:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06493-01; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:30:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B260B1FD24; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:06:34 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAD71FD42 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:06:32 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 00418-03-3 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:06:29 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 840E91FCF3 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: FROM aditya.annarb01.mi.comcast.net (c-68-40-50-205.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.50.205]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 45339FF2.5F395.6580 ; 16 Oct 2006 11:06:26 -0400 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users In-Reply-To: <4532AF5B.2090007@seznam.cz> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:31387 Archived-At: On Sun, 15 Oct 2006, Vit Zyka wrote: > Great, thank you Hans! > > Let us process to teh next two problems also visible in the test file. > > 1. [snip] > 2. Accented characters inside \typebuffer are type set as > \dochar {225} This seems to be a bug. In utf-8 encoding, if an accented character is the first character of a buffer, it gets typed correctly. All other accented charaters come out as \dochar {225}. \getbuffer works fine. Can TeX choose the input encoding while writing files? If not, there may be really no robust way to solve this problem. Aditya