From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/114349 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Pettersson via ntg-context Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: XMP metadata schema yields invalid PDF/A Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1f7be313-e921-1fdf-f87c-33d3899e397a@xs4all.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="q6IjFK8DPNU740+N" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16639"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Karl Pettersson , mailing list for ConTeXt users To: luigi scarso Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sat Feb 05 13:15:02 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from zapf.boekplan.nl ([5.39.185.232] helo=zapf.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nGJy1-00042o-LW for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2022 13:15:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EE92A280B; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YzyAXNx1V1pv; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:26 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39B12A2826; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:25 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAE62A2826 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at zapf.boekplan.nl Original-Received: from zapf.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zapf.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYjJn3cFYv3W for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:22 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=93.188.3.37; helo=smtp.outgoing.loopia.se; envelope-from=karl.pettersson@klpn.se; receiver= Original-Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se (smtp.outgoing.loopia.se [93.188.3.37]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zapf.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF4542A280B for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id C609B2F13121 for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from s630.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B702D2F59535; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from s898.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s630.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57AF13ACE2F; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se Original-Received: from s899.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s898.loopia.se (s898.loopia.se [172.22.190.17]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id G5frD3CeuTuA; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:19 +0100 (CET) X-Loopia-Auth: user X-Loopia-User: karl.pettersson@klpn.se X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 185.178.142.95 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [185.178.142.95]) (Authenticated sender: karl.pettersson@klpn.se) by s899.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 315A42C90C39; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:14:19 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Original-Sender: "ntg-context" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.comp.tex.context:114349 Archived-At: --q6IjFK8DPNU740+N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 09:59:44AM +0100, luigi scarso wrote: > it's not redefined -- it's dropped. And this is ok. > You can also check with > FOO > > > TITLE > > > and again it's valid. > But > https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:19005:-1:ed-1:v2:cor:1:v1:en > and > https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:19005:-1:ed-1:v2:cor:2:v1:en:tab:1 > suggest that dc:description and dc:title are of the same type, > which is coherent with > XMPSpecificationPart1.pdf > as in > https://github.com/adobe/XMP-Toolkit-SDK/tree/main/docs > > I.e. these are correct -- but Subject must agree with dc:description > > > > > > > > TITLE > > > > At least, this is what I understand. > >From what I understand, ConTeXt applies a custom Dublin Core schema containing just a redefinition of dc:description, which is not coherent with how dc:description is written by the application. This patch to lpdf-pda.xml removes the validation error. > -- > luigi -- Karl Pettersson, Sweden Uppsala https://static-dust.klpn.se/ --q6IjFK8DPNU740+N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="lpdf-pda.diff" 79a80,97 > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ > pdf > Dubline Core Schema > > > > internal > Subject in Document Properties > description > Text > > > > > > > > --q6IjFK8DPNU740+N Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSWYgeW91ciBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBvZiBpbnRlcmVz dCB0byBvdGhlcnMgYXMgd2VsbCwgcGxlYXNlIGFkZCBhbiBlbnRyeSB0byB0aGUgV2lraSEKCm1h aWxsaXN0IDogbnRnLWNvbnRleHRAbnRnLm5sIC8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5udGcubmwvbWFpbG1hbi9s aXN0aW5mby9udGctY29udGV4dAp3ZWJwYWdlICA6IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucHJhZ21hLWFkZS5ubCAv IGh0dHA6Ly9jb250ZXh0LmFhbmhldC5uZXQKYXJjaGl2ZSAgOiBodHRwczovL2JpdGJ1Y2tldC5v cmcvcGhnL2NvbnRleHQtbWlycm9yL2NvbW1pdHMvCndpa2kgICAgIDogaHR0cDovL2NvbnRleHRn YXJkZW4ubmV0Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCg== --q6IjFK8DPNU740+N--