From: Jim <zlists+context@jdvb.ca>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: [NTG-context] Re: How hard should something get \smash-ed ?
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:58:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4UqC9pjldOSvCdZ@x360.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHy-LL8H0OvDJyDotVF6D5BNA8r5Swncieha+qi40r18jYDqNw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Mikael et al,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 07:44 (+0100), Mikael Sundqvist wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 1:43 AM Jim <zlists+context@jdvb.ca> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> In plain TeX,
>> $$\smash{\sum_0^n}$$
>> is set in \displaystyle, just like
>> $$\smash{\sum_0^n}$$
>> However, ConTeXt
>> \starttext
>> $$\smash{\sum^0_n}$$
>> \stoptext
>> outputs the above in \textstyle, whereas
>> \starttext
>> $$\sum^0_n$$
>> \stoptext
>> is in (of course(?)) \displaystyle.
>> Is this difference intentional?
> Thanks for reporting. I don't think it is intentional. (Can you show your
> real world example where \smash is needed? It seems to not really be used
> in any macro in ConTeXt.)
At the risk of citing an example using a deprecated feature, in
https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Tables/Deprecated/Table
the following example is shown:
\starttable[|M|c|]
\HL
\VL \VL a \VL \AR
\DC \DL[1] \DR
\VL \smash{\displaystyle\sum_0^N} \VL b \VL \AR
\DC \DL[1] \DR
\VL \VL c \VL \AR
\HL
\stoptable
Without \smash{}, the second row is higher than (presumably) whomever wrote
the example wanted. I can imagine someone wanting to do something like
that in another type of table, even using a non-deprecated type of table.
(I added \displaystyle to the example yesterday to make it do what the
example's author intended.)
> PS $$ is not meant to be used in ConTeXt. If you want inline math in
> display style, use \dm {}, and if you want displayed formulas in display
> style, use \startformula \stopformula.
Yeah... as a very-long-time plain TeX user, old habits die hard (and I am
not using any math in my current main use of ConTeXt).
The main reason for using $$ in my report was because that is what is in
the wiki page. (And the issue is still there with \startformula and
\stopformula anyway.)
Cheers.
Jim
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl
webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror)
archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context
wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 0:40 [NTG-context] " Jim
2025-01-13 6:44 ` [NTG-context] " Mikael Sundqvist
2025-01-13 7:49 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2025-01-13 15:21 ` Jim
2025-01-13 14:58 ` Jim [this message]
2025-01-13 16:14 ` Hans Hagen via ntg-context
2025-01-13 16:28 ` Jim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4UqC9pjldOSvCdZ@x360.localdomain \
--to=zlists+context@jdvb.ca \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).